Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Tools for Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Underserved Young Adult Populations: A Systematic Review
Audrey A Opoku-Acheampong1, Richard R Rosenkranz1, Koushik Adhikari2
1Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics, and Health, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Insights
This review identified five non-clinical tools to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in young adults. These tools offer accessible methods for evaluating CVD risk factors in underserved populations.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Cardiology
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) poses a significant global mortality risk.
- Current CVD risk assessment often relies on clinical data, potentially limiting accessibility.
- Underserved young adult populations (18-34 years) require tailored risk assessment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise, compare, and summarize non-clinically based tools for CVD risk assessment.
- Focus on tools applicable to underserved young adults (18-34 years).
- Identify accessible CVD risk assessment methods for this demographic.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed and Scopus (2008-2019).
- Keywords included CVD and risk assessment terms.
- Inclusion criteria focused on non-clinical tools for young adults.
Main Results:
- 67 studies were eligible from 10,383 initially identified.
- Only 5 studies specifically assessed CVD risk in underserved young adults.
- 21 distinct CVD risk tools were found; 6 were non-clinical.
Conclusions:
- Limited research exists on non-clinical CVD risk tools for underserved young adults.
- Key non-clinical tools identified include the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire and WHO STEPS.
- Further development and validation of these tools are needed for this population.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD, i.e., disease of the heart and blood vessels) is a major cause of death globally. Current assessment tools use either clinical or non-clinical factors alone or in combination to assess CVD risk. The aim of this review was to critically appraise, compare, and summarize existing non-clinically based tools for assessing CVD risk factors in underserved young adult (18-34-year-old) populations. Two online electronic databases-PubMed and Scopus-were searched to identify existing risk assessment tools, using a combination of CVD-related keywords. The search was limited to articles available in English only and published between January 2008 and January 2019. Of the 10,383 studies initially identified, 67 were eligible. In total, 5 out of the 67 articles assessed CVD risk in underserved young adult populations. A total of 21 distinct CVD risk assessment tools were identified; six of these did not require clinical or laboratory data in their estimation (i.e., non-clinical). The main non-clinically based tools identified were the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire, the Health Beliefs Related to CVD-Perception measure, the Healthy Eating Opinion Survey, the Perception of Risk of Heart Disease Scale, and the WHO STEPwise approach to chronic disease factor surveillance (i.e., the STEPS instrument).
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...

