Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An
Santiago Abarno1, Arthur Felipe Gehrke2, Berenice Anina Dedavid3
1Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Spain.
Background:
Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood.
Objectives:
This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials.
Material And Methods:
A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image.
Results:
Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 > G4 > G5 > G1 > G2 > G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 > G4 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 > G5 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G6 with load 1 and G5 > G1 > G2 > G6 > G4 > G3 with load 2.
Conclusions:
Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.
