Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
External validity of analogue sexual risk laboratory data
Jeffrey S Simons1, Stephen A Maisto1, Tibor P Palfai2
1Department of Psychology.
Abstract:
This article presents data on the external validity of an alcohol administration study of sexual decision-making in men who have sex with men (MSM) ages 21-50. Men (N = 135) randomized to alcohol (blood alcohol concentration [BAC] = .075%) or water control conditions reported intentions to engage in condomless anal intercourse (CAI) in response to video vignettes. Following the experiment participants provided 6 weeks of experience sampling method (ESM) data assessing intoxication, sexual arousal, partner relationship, and sexual behavior. Laboratory CAI intentions were hypothesized to predict future CAI behavior, and associations were hypothesized to be conditional upon sexual arousal and intoxication contextual factors as well as laboratory beverage condition. The hypotheses were partially supported. CAI intentions were correlated with subject proportions of days engaging in CAI (r = .29). A multilevel analysis indicated, on average, CAI intention predicted increased probability of CAI versus anal intercourse with a condom (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.43). There was mixed evidence of CAI intentions effects being conditional upon laboratory condition as well as arousal and intoxication contextual factors. Graphs of conditional marginal effects identified regions of significance. Effects of CAI intention for men in the alcohol condition on the CAI versus No Sex contrast were significant when sexual arousal was elevated. CAI intentions for men in the water control condition predicted a higher probability of CAI versus anal intercourse with a condom when intoxication was moderately elevated and/or arousal moderately low. The results support the external validity of alcohol administration experiments of sexual decision-making among MSM and, reciprocally, provide support for the validity of ESM assessment of sexual behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Longitudinal Research