Assessment of nanoparticle immersion depth at liquid interfaces from chemically equivalent macroscopic surfaces
Joeri Smits1, Rajendra Prasad Giri2, Chen Shen3
1Advanced Ceramics, University of Bremen, Am Biologischen Garten 2, Bremen D-28359, Germany.
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
|January 2, 2022
Summary
Macroscopic contact angles (mCAs) can predict nanoparticle (NP) wettability, but only if adsorption barriers are considered. Receding contact angles (RCAs) on smooth surfaces offer a reliable estimate for NP wetting properties.
Area of Science:
- Colloid and surface science
- Materials science
Background:
- Wettability of nanoparticles (NPs) is crucial for applications like emulsion formulation and water remediation.
- Predicting NP wettability from macroscopic measurements is challenging due to surface complexities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if macroscopic contact angles (mCAs) can accurately predict the wettability of nanoparticles (NPs) at liquid interfaces.
- To assess the influence of surface roughness and electrokinetic potential on NP wettability predictions.
Main Methods:
- Compared wettability of pure silica and amino-terminated silica NPs with macroscopic surfaces of varying roughness.
- Utilized electrophoretic light scattering and streaming current analysis to confirm surface chemistry equivalence.
- Measured advancing (ACAs) and receding contact angles (RCAs) and employed X-ray reflectivity (XRR) to determine NP wettability.
Main Results:
- Receding contact angles (RCAs) on smooth surfaces generally correlate well with NP wetting properties.
- Macroscopic contact angles alone are insufficient to predict adsorption barriers that hinder NP adsorption to interfaces.
- Pure silica nanoparticles exhibited adsorption barriers not predicted by mCAs alone.
Conclusions:
- While mCAs provide insights, they cannot fully predict NP interfacial behavior without considering adsorption phenomena.
- The study facilitates NP wettability assessment for diverse applications by highlighting the importance of RCA and adsorption barrier evaluation.
Keywords:
Atomic force microscopyContact angleElectrophoretic mobilityImmersion depthLiquid surface/interfaceNanoparticlesSessile dropStreaming currentX-ray reflectivityZeta (electrokinetic) potential

