Comparison of three different nutrition screening tools for pediatric inpatients

Nilgun Seremet Kurklu1, Ferda Geyin2, Latife Ceylan3

  • 1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Insights

Early detection of malnutrition risk in hospitalized children is crucial. The Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) and Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool (PNST) show high sensitivity for assessing malnutrition in pediatric inpatients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Clinical Assessment
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Early identification of malnutrition risk in hospitalized children is vital to prevent complications.
  • This study addresses the need for reliable nutrition screening tools in pediatric care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess malnutrition risk in pediatric inpatients using three distinct screening tools.
  • To evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of these nutrition screening tools.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving 176 children (1-16 years) admitted to a pediatric service.
  • Nutrition status assessed using height for age (HFA), weight for age (WFA), and body mass index for age (BFA) z-scores.
  • Malnutrition risk evaluated using STRONGkids, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), and Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool (PNST).

Main Results:

  • Malnutrition incidence was 8.5% (HFA), 14.8% (BFA), and 6.3% (WFA).
  • WFA z-scores were significantly higher in children without malnutrition risk (P < 0.05).
  • PYMS demonstrated high sensitivity for WFA (90.9%) and BFA (84.6%); PNST showed high sensitivity for HFA (88.9%).

Conclusions:

  • The Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) and Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool (PNST) are effective for malnutrition risk assessment in pediatric inpatients.
  • Both PYMS and PNST exhibit high sensitivity, supporting their clinical utility.
Abstract