PET/CT variants and pitfalls in malignant melanoma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

A 3D Organotypic Melanoma Spheroid Skin Model
Published on: May 18, 2018
Nicolas Aide1, Amir Iravani2, Kevin Prigent3
1PET Centre, University Hospital, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France. nicolasaide0@gmail.com.
Abstract:
18F-FDG PET/CT plays an increasingly pivotal role in the staging and post-treatment monitoring of high-risk melanoma patients, augmented by the introduction of therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), that have novel modes of action that challenge conventional response assessment. Simultaneously, technological advances have been regularly released, including advanced reconstruction algorithms, digital PET and motion correction, which have allowed the PET community to detect ever-smaller cancer lesions, improving diagnostic performance in the context of indications previously viewed as limitations, such as detection of in-transit disease and confirmation of the nature of small pulmonary metastases apparent on CT.This review will provide advice regarding melanoma-related PET protocols and will focus on variants encountered during the imaging of melanoma patients. Emphasis will be made on pitfalls related to non-malignant diseases and treatment-related findings that may confound accurate interpretation unless recognized. The latter include signs of immune activation and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Technology-related pitfalls are also discussed, since while new PET technologies improve detection of small lesions, these may also induce false-positive cases and require a learning curve to be observed. In these times of the COVID 19 pandemic, cases illustrating lessons learned from COVID 19 or vaccination-related pitfalls will also be described.
Insights
This review guides the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for melanoma, addressing challenges from new therapies and advanced technology. It highlights potential interpretation pitfalls, including treatment effects and COVID-19 related findings.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background:
- 18F-FDG PET/CT is crucial for staging and monitoring high-risk melanoma.
- Novel therapies like tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) complicate response assessment.
- Technological advancements enhance detection of small lesions but introduce new interpretation challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide guidance on PET/CT protocols for melanoma imaging.
- To discuss interpretation pitfalls related to melanoma treatment and non-malignant conditions.
- To address challenges posed by new PET technologies and recent clinical contexts like COVID-19.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical practice guidelines for melanoma PET/CT.
- Analysis of common and emerging pitfalls in interpreting PET/CT scans.
- Inclusion of case examples illustrating diagnostic challenges.
Main Results:
- New therapies and technologies necessitate updated interpretation strategies for melanoma PET/CT.
- Non-malignant findings and treatment-related changes (e.g., immune activation) can mimic malignancy.
- Advanced PET technology improves lesion detection but requires careful evaluation to avoid false positives.
Conclusions:
- Optimized PET/CT protocols and awareness of potential pitfalls are essential for accurate melanoma management.
- Understanding treatment effects, immune-related adverse events, and technological limitations is critical.
- Continuous education is needed to navigate evolving diagnostic landscapes in melanoma imaging.

