Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

52
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
52
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

16
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
16
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.4K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.4K
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

405
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
405

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond significance: Toward a more dynamic, relational, and culturally inclusive framework on love.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Dual Nature of Sexual Desire: The Unique Roles of General and Partner-Specific Sexual Desire in Romantic Relationships.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

FLASH: Energy-Efficient FPGA Acceleration via Linear Approximation and Streamlined Two-Stage Pipeline Architectures for Quantized CNN-Transformer Hybrid Networks.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same author

Compensatory Effects of Affectionate Communication in Marriages with Infrequent Sexual Activity.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

[The Incidence and Characteristics of Out-of-Hospital Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the Gyeongnam Region, the Republic of Korea in 2021].

Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong·2025
Same author

Improved Mechanical Stability and Proton Conductivity of Reinforced Membranes for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs).

ACS physical chemistry Au·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Cultural Variability in the Attribute Framing Effect.

Jeong Eun Cheon1, Yeseul Nam1,2, Kaylyn J Kim1

  • 1Social and Cultural Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

Frontiers in Psychology
|January 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Cultural framing effects in decision-making differ. Korean participants showed greater sensitivity to positive versus negative frames than North Americans, explained by a stronger prevention focus.

Keywords:
attribute framing effectculturedecision makingframing effectregulatory focus

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.9K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

573

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.9K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

573

Area of Science:

  • Decision Making
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Decision-making is influenced by information framing, where equivalent options presented positively or negatively yield different choices.
  • The attribute framing effect describes this phenomenon, but its cross-cultural variability is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cultural differences in sensitivity to the attribute framing effect.
  • To explore the role of regulatory focus (prevention vs. promotion) in explaining these cultural differences.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative study involving participants from South Korea and the United States.
  • Analysis of how framing valence (positive vs. negative) impacts evaluations of identical options.

Main Results:

  • Korean participants exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to attribute framing compared to North American participants.
  • A stronger prevention orientation in Korean culture, versus a promotion orientation in American culture, accounted for the observed differences in framing effect sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • Cultural factors, specifically regulatory focus, significantly moderate the attribute framing effect.
  • Understanding cultural nuances is crucial for effective communication and decision-making strategies across diverse populations.