Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

A Protocol for the Use of Remotely-Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Multiple Sclerosis MS
Published on: December 26, 2015
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on sleep in patients with multiple sclerosis-A pilot study
Moussa A Chalah1, Christina Grigorescu2, Tania Kümpfel3
1Univ Paris Est Creteil, Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique (ENT), EA 4391, F-94010 Creteil, France; AP-HP, Henri Mondor university hospital, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, F-94010 Creteil, France.
Background:
Sleep complaints are commonly reported by patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Several pharmacological and alternative interventions have been tried, but are usually faced by limited efficacy. Hence, exploring other methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), might be of interest. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of bifrontal tDCS on subjective (i.e., Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)) and objective sleep measures (i.e., actigraphy).
Methods:
Seven patients completed the study. Patients randomly received two blocks of five daily sessions each in a crossover design (active and sham, with a washout interval of three weeks). The anode and cathode were placed over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, respectively. Sleep assessment included ESS, sleep onset latency, total sleep duration, time in bed, sleep efficiency, waking after sleep onset, and number of awakenings.
Results:
Compared to baseline scores (11.14 ± 4.06), significant decrease in ESS was obtained after active intervention (7.86 ± 4.18; p = 0.011), but not after sham intervention (9.57 ± 5.62; p = 0.142). No significant changes were observed with regards to actigraphy measures. Sessions were well tolerated, and no serious side-effects were reported at any time.
Conclusion:
Bifrontal tDCS resulted in significant improvement in daytime sleepiness, but did not yield any effect on objective sleep measures in PwMS. This discrepency might be explained by the modest association that could exist between objective and subjective sleep measures. In addition, it could be assumed that modulating objective sleep measures would require a larger sample size, more stimulation sessions, or modulation of other cortical areas.
More Related Videos
08:22Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: An Update on Safety and Tolerability
Published on: October 7, 2017
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025