Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025
5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Parenchymal Mass Loss During Partial Nephrectomy: Role of Devascularized Parenchymal Mass and Excised Parenchymal
Qi Liu1, Ming Gao2, Tian X Lin3
1Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urinary Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract:
This study included 93 patients with renal masses who underwent standard partial nephrectomy or tumor enucleation. After surgery, parenchymal mass loss caused by devascularization resulted in more damage to renal function than excised parenchymal mass loss. Surgeons should seek better techniques to decrease devascularization during reconstruction.
Introduction:
To evaluate the importance of devascularized parenchymal mass(DPM) and excised parenchymal mass(EPM) in functional preservation after standard partial nephrectomy(SPN).
Patients And Methods:
Forty-one patients who underwent pure tumor enucleation(TE) and 52 patients who underwent SPN with necessary data were included. As no EPM was lost in TE, the TE samples were used to estimate the degree of volume shrinkage that occurred when the measurements were performed in vivo with blood flow versus ex vivo without, and the shrinkage ratio was calculated as specimen volume divided by tumor volume in vivo. In SPN, the specimen volume comprised tumor volume plus EPM. The EPM was calculated as specimen volume divided by shrinkage ratio minus tumor volume in vivo. The DPM was defined as total ipsilateral parenchymal mass loss minus EPM. T tests, χ2 test, and Mann-Whitney U tests were employed to compare clinical characteristics. Multivariate analysis was used to identify variables that correlated with glomerular filtration rate(GFR) preservation.
Results:
The mean sizes of devascularized and excised parenchymal masses were 13.6 cm3 and 5.2 cm3 (P = .01), which accounted for 7.8% and 3.4% of preoperative ipsilateral parenchymal mass (P = .03) in SPN, respectively. The shrinkage ratio was 0.71 and correlation coefficient was 0.965. After stepwise regression, DPM, and preoperative GFR were significantly associated with global GFR preservation.
Conclusion:
The DPM comprises most of parenchymal mass loss after SPN and plays a more important role than EPM on functional outcomes. Surgeons should pay more attention to reducing devascularization during partial nephrectomy.
