Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta-blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection
Chan Soon Park1, Jin Joo Park2, In-Chang Hwang2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Beta-blockers improve survival in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and lower global longitudinal strain (GLS < 10%). However, those with higher GLS (≥ 10%) do not show similar survival benefits from beta-blockers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Myocardial Mechanics
Background:
- Beta-blockers are a cornerstone therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Individual patient response to beta-blockers varies, suggesting a need for personalized treatment strategies.
- Global longitudinal strain (GLS), a measure of myocardial deformation, may offer prognostic insights beyond ejection fraction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential impact of beta-blocker therapy on long-term survival in HFrEF patients based on their baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS).
- To determine if GLS can identify HFrEF patients who may not benefit from beta-blockers.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2126 HFrEF patients from the "Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Acute Heart Failure" registry.
- Patients were stratified into two groups: GLS ≥ 10% and GLS < 10%.
- Five-year all-cause mortality was assessed in relation to beta-blocker use using inverse probability treatment-weighting and Cox regression analyses.
Main Results:
- Beta-blocker use was associated with significantly improved 5-year survival in patients with GLS < 10% (HR 0.70, P < 0.001).
- No significant survival benefit from beta-blockers was observed in patients with GLS ≥ 10% (P > 0.05).
- Overall, 1399 patients received beta-blockers, and 864 patients died during the 5-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Global longitudinal strain (GLS) may serve as a biomarker to identify HFrEF patients with attenuated benefits from beta-blocker therapy.
- GLS < 10% identifies patients likely to benefit from beta-blockers, while GLS ≥ 10% suggests a subgroup where benefits are not evident.
- These findings support the potential role of GLS in tailoring beta-blocker treatment for HFrEF patients.
Aims:
Not all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefit equally from beta-blockers. Previous studies suggest that myocardial strain that reflects myocardial deformation may have a better prognostic value than the left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to evaluate the differential effect of beta-blockers according to the global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with HFrEF.
Methods And Results:
Of the 4312 patients in the Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Acute Heart Failure registry, we included 2126 HFrEF patients whose data on beta-blocker use and GLS were available. Patients were categorized into two groups: one group of patients had GLS ≥ 10%, and the other group had GLS < 10%. The primary outcome was 5 year all-cause mortality according to beta-blocker use. Of the 2126 patients with HFrEF, 526 (24.7%) and 1600 (75.3%) patients had GLS ≥ 10% and <10%, respectively. Overall, 1399 patients (65.8%) received beta-blockers, and 864 (40.6%) patients died during the 5 year follow-up. Beta-blocker use was associated with improved survival in patients with GLS < 10% in both the inverse probability treatment-weighted (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.83, P < 0.001) and Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.81; P < 0.001). However, beta-blocker use was not associated with better survival in patients with GLS ≥ 10% in the inverse probability treatment-weighted and Cox regression analyses (both P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
Beta-blocker use appears to be associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and GLS < 10%, but this is not the case in patients with GLS ≥ 10%. Therefore, GLS may be used to identify patients who have attenuated benefits from beta-blockers in HFrEF.
Clinical Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03513653 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03513653).
More Related Videos
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies