[Diagnostic delay in rare diseases: systematic review.]

Minerva Berrocal-Acedo1, Juan Benito-Lozano2, Verónica Alonso-Ferreira2,3

  • 1Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Sevilla (US). Sevilla. España.

Insights

Diagnosing rare diseases (RDs) often takes over a year, exceeding the International Consortium for Rare Diseases Research (IRDiRC) goal. This systematic review highlights a significant diagnostic delay for many patients with rare conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Patient Advocacy

Background:

  • The International Consortium for Rare Diseases Research (IRDiRC) aims for rare disease (RD) diagnosis within one year.
  • A diagnostic delay, defined as over one year, is a critical issue in rare disease management.
  • Current literature lacks comprehensive data on the time to diagnosis for the full spectrum of rare diseases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review existing scientific evidence on the time to diagnosis for patients with rare diseases.
  • To determine the prevalence of diagnostic delays (exceeding one year) in rare diseases.
  • To assess whether current diagnostic timelines align with IRDiRC objectives.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searches performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases.
  • Article quality assessed using the STROBE statement.

Main Results:

  • Seventeen articles were included in the review.
  • Included studies focused on specific rare diseases, primarily metabolic, neurological, and immune disorders.
  • The majority of studies indicated a diagnostic timeline exceeding one year for these rare diseases.

Conclusions:

  • Scientific literature quantifying rare disease diagnostic timelines remains limited.
  • A diagnostic delay of over one year is common, falling short of IRDiRC targets.
  • Advancements are needed to shorten the time from symptom onset to accurate rare disease diagnosis.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.4K
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies01:27

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies

Assessing and diagnosing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) involves a detailed approach that includes a comprehensive review of medical history, physical examination, and a variety of diagnostic tests. This thorough evaluation is essential to ensure an accurate diagnosis and guide effective management strategies.
Medical History
2.6K
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test01:22

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

In clinical practice, the direct measurement of hepatic blood flow to evaluate liver function presents significant challenges due to the intricate and specialized nature of the necessary techniques. Consequently, healthcare professionals often rely on empirical estimates derived from thorough patient examinations and liver function tests to gauge liver health. Among the tools at their disposal, the Child–Pugh and MELD scoring systems stand out for their ability to categorize and assess...
12