Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ultrasonography01:17

Ultrasonography

6.5K
Ultrasonography is an imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the body's internal structures. It is a non-invasive and safe procedure that does not involve the use of ionizing radiation, making it widely used in various medical fields. Ultrasonography is used to study heart function, blood flow in the neck or extremities, certain conditions such as gallbladder disease, and fetal growth and development.
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
6.5K
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography01:24

Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

78
IntroductionUltrasonography, or renal ultrasound, is a noninvasive medical imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding tissues.Indications for Urinary System UltrasonographyUrinary system ultrasonography is indicated in various clinical scenarios, such as:Kidney Stones (Urolithiasis): To detect and monitor the size and presence of kidney or urinary tract stones.Hydronephrosis: To assess the dilation of the renal pelvis and...
78
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan01:25

Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan

223
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and FibroScan are valuable diagnostic tools in gastroenterology and hepatology, each with specific applications and techniques.
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
223

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explainable Quality Assessment and Measurement from Real-World Hip Ultrasound Cine Sweeps.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Does adding a high-resolution 3D sequence improve the accuracy of erosion detection in pediatric sacroiliac joint MRI?

European radiology·2026
Same author

Robust cross-domain generalization using unlabeled target data with source-domain supervision.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in fracture detection with ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The ultrasound journal·2026
Same author

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopaedics.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Rate of Recommendation for Follow-up MRI Post-shoulder Ultrasound: An Initial Benchmarking Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Functional Outcomes and Complications of Dual Mobility Versus Fixed-Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures over 55 Years: A Retrospective Analysis.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Prevalence of Atherosclerosis in Femoral and Popliteal Arteries in Advanced Osteoarthritis Knee: A Cross Sectional Ultrasound Study.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Pre-operative Physical Therapy on Total Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Predictive Value of Radiographs in Assessment of Post-Hemiarthroplasty Recovery Following Femoral Neck Fractures Amongst the Elderly.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery at Three or More Levels.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same journal

Morphological Analysis of Thoracolumbar Vertebrae Based on Age and Gender in Indonesia Population: A Computed Tomography-Based Study.

Indian journal of orthopaedics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
04:00

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Published on: July 26, 2024

741

Artificial Intelligence to Automatically Assess Scan Quality in Hip Ultrasound.

Abhilash Rakkundeth Hareendranathan1, Baljot S Chahal1, Dornoosh Zonoobi2

  • 1Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2B7 Canada.

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
|January 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an automated computer system that uses deep learning to check the quality of hip ultrasound scans in babies. By identifying key anatomical markers, the software helps ensure images are clear enough for doctors to accurately screen for hip dysplasia, reducing the risk of errors caused by manual assessment.

Keywords:
3D ultrasoundArtificial intelligenceConvolutional Neural NetworksDevelopmental dysplasia of the hipDysplasiaGraf criteriaHip ultrasoundRecurrent neural networkScan qualityUniversal screeningdeep learningpediatric diagnosticsimage quality assessmenthip dysplasia screening

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
10:53

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure

Published on: January 14, 2014

5.6K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
04:00

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Published on: July 26, 2024

741
Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
10:53

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure

Published on: January 14, 2014

5.6K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging diagnostics within Artificial Intelligence
  • Pediatric orthopedics and musculoskeletal screening

Background:

Ultrasound remains a primary tool for early identification of hip dysplasia in infants due to its accessibility and low cost. However, the diagnostic utility of these examinations relies heavily on the technical proficiency of the operator. Poor image acquisition often results in incorrect clinical conclusions, yet novice practitioners frequently struggle to identify suboptimal visual data. Current protocols rely on subjective human evaluation of anatomical landmarks, which introduces significant variability and potential for error. No prior work had resolved the challenge of standardizing these assessments through objective, automated computational means. That uncertainty drove the need for a more reliable, machine-based approach to verify scan integrity. This gap motivated the development of a system capable of providing consistent feedback during the imaging process. The following analysis explores how deep learning architectures can address these persistent limitations in pediatric diagnostic workflows.

Purpose Of The Study:

The primary aim of this research is to develop an automated system for evaluating the quality of hip ultrasound scans using machine learning. This initiative addresses the persistent challenge of subjective image interpretation in pediatric clinical practice. Inexperienced operators often lack the expertise to recognize when an image is insufficient for diagnostic purposes. Such deficiencies frequently lead to inaccurate clinical assessments and missed cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip. The researchers sought to replace manual, error-prone landmark identification with a more objective computational framework. By training models to detect specific anatomical structures, the team intended to provide real-time feedback on scan adequacy. This effort was motivated by the need to improve the reliability of point-of-care diagnostics in infant populations. The study explores whether automated verification can bridge the gap between novice scanning skills and the requirement for high-quality diagnostic data.

Main Methods:

The investigators employed a supervised learning design to develop their diagnostic classification system. They curated a training library consisting of one hundred three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. A separate validation cohort of one hundred seven images was used to test the performance of the trained models. Each image in the validation set underwent independent scoring by three non-expert reviewers and one board-certified radiologist. The team constructed distinct Convolutional Neural Network architectures for each of the four anatomical target regions. These networks functioned as binary classifiers to distinguish between acceptable and inadequate image quality. Statistical evaluation involved calculating classification accuracy alongside Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Cohen's kappa metrics. This rigorous review approach ensured that the algorithmic performance was benchmarked against established human expertise.

Main Results:

The computational models achieved a minimum accuracy of 85% for all four targeted anatomical landmarks. The femoral head detection reached the highest performance level, yielding an accuracy of 98%. The ilium landmark was identified with 89% accuracy, while the os ischium and labrum achieved 85% and 94% respectively. Regarding agreement with manual assessments, the ilium showed an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.81 and a kappa of 0.56. The os ischium demonstrated strong consistency, with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.89 and a kappa of 0.63. The femoral head also displayed robust agreement, scoring 0.83 for the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and 0.66 for the kappa metric. Finally, the labrum exhibited moderate agreement, with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.65 and a kappa of 0.33.

Conclusions:

The researchers propose that automated landmark detection provides a robust mechanism for verifying hip ultrasound image integrity. Their findings suggest that machine learning models can achieve high classification accuracy across all four primary anatomical structures. The study demonstrates that this computational approach maintains strong agreement with expert human readers during validation trials. Synthesis and implications indicate that such tools could standardize screening procedures across diverse clinical settings. By minimizing subjective interpretation, this technology may reduce the incidence of diagnostic errors in infant hip examinations. The authors emphasize that consistent scan quality is a prerequisite for effective population-level health monitoring. Future implementation of these models could support less experienced users in obtaining diagnostic-grade images during point-of-care encounters. This evidence highlights the potential for digital assistance to enhance the reliability of routine pediatric musculoskeletal assessments.

The researchers propose a deep learning framework that classifies scan quality by detecting four specific anatomical landmarks. This binary system achieves at least 85% accuracy for each marker, with the femoral head reaching 98% precision, thereby providing an objective alternative to subjective human visual inspection.

The team utilized Convolutional Neural Network architectures to process three-dimensional ultrasound data. These models were specifically trained to recognize the straight horizontal iliac wing, the labrum, the os ischium, and the midportion of the femoral head within the captured volumes.

The authors note that identifying these four landmarks is necessary because they serve as the standard criteria for determining if a hip ultrasound image is diagnostic. Without these specific visual markers, clinicians cannot reliably assess the hip joint, leading to potential misdiagnosis of developmental dysplasia.

The researchers employed a dataset of 100 three-dimensional ultrasound images for training, followed by validation on a separate set of 107 images. These data were annotated by three non-expert readers and one expert radiologist to establish a ground truth for model performance.

The performance was measured using accuracy scores, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, and Cohen's kappa coefficients. The femoral head showed the highest accuracy at 98%, while the labrum demonstrated moderate agreement, with a kappa value of 0.33, compared to the higher agreement observed for other structures.

The authors state that this technology could facilitate more widespread use of ultrasound in population screening. By ensuring high scan quality, the system allows less experienced practitioners to perform reliable examinations, potentially expanding access to early detection for developmental dysplasia of the hip.