Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Long-Term Health Impacts of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection on Offspring
Published on: May 17, 2024
Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and
Laura J O'Byrne1,2, Safi G Alqatari3, Gillian M Maher1,4
1INFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Background:
Biologic medications, specifically tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, have become increasingly prevalent in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease (CID) in pregnancy.
Objective:
To determine pregnancy outcomes in women with CID exposed to biologics during pregnancy.
Search Strategy:
PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through January 1998-July 2021.
Selection Criteria:
Peer-reviewed, English-language cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series that contained original data.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors independently conducted data extraction. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model was used to pool outcomes. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the mean of proportions of outcomes across exposure groups using the 'treated' group as the reference category. All studies were evaluated using an appropriate quality assessment tool. The GRADE approach was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence.
Main Results:
Thirty-five studies, describing 11 172 pregnancies, were eligible for inclusion. Analysis showed pooled proportions for congenital malformations as follows: treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.04; I2 = 77) versus disease-matched 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.05. I2 = 86; p = 0.238); preterm delivery treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.10-0.14; I2 = 88) versus disease-matched 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.12; I2 = 87; p = 0.250); severe neonatal infection: treated 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.07; I2 = 88) versus disease-matched 0.05 (95% CI 0.02-0.07; I2 = 94; p = 0.970); low birthweight: treated 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.12; I2 = 93) versus disease-matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.07-0.09; I2 = 0; p = 0.241); pooled miscarriage: treated 0.13 (95% CI 0.10-0.15; I2 = 77) versus disease-matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.04-0.11; I2 = 5; p = 0.078); pre-eclampsia; treated 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02; I2 = 0) versus disease-matched 0.01 (95% CI 0.00-0.01; I2 = 0; p = 0.193). No statistical differences in proportions were observed. GRADE certainty of findings was low to very low.
Conclusion:
We demonstrated comparable pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies exposed to biologics, disease-matched controls and CID-free pregnancies using the GRADE approach.
More Related Videos
06:55Assessment of Maternal Vascular Remodeling During Pregnancy in the Mouse Uterus
Published on: December 5, 2015
09:09Generating a Reproducible Model of Mid-Gestational Maternal Immune Activation using PolyI:C to Study Susceptibility and Resilience in Offspring
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
01:07Teratogenicity
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:28Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
01:59CRISPR