Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
Published on: February 7, 2025
Seeking a better balance between efficiency and interpretability: Comparing the likert response format with the
Mark Wilson1, Shruti Bathia1, Linda Morell1
1Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley.
Abstract:
The Likert item response format for items is almost ubiquitous in the social sciences and has particular virtues regarding the relative simplicity of item-generation and the efficiency for coding responses. However, in this article, we critique this very common item format, focusing on its affordance for interpretation in terms of internal structure validity evidence. We suggest an alternative, the Guttman response format, which we see as providing a better approach for gathering and interpreting internal structure validity evidence. Using a specific survey-based example, we illustrate how items in this alternative format can be developed, exemplify how such items operate, and explore some comparisons between the results from using the two formats. In conclusion, we recommend usage of the Guttman response format for improving the interpretability of the resulting outcomes. Finally, we also note how this approach may be used in tandem with items that use the Likert response format to help balance efficiency with interpretability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Group Design
Surveys
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Goodness-of-Fit Test

