Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Non-strategic detection of identity-threatening information: Epistemic validation and identity defense may share a
Johanna Abendroth1, Peter Nauroth2, Tobias Richter1
1Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Readers use prior knowledge to evaluate the validity of statements and detect false information without effort and strategic control. The present study expands this research by exploring whether people also non-strategically detect information that threatens their social identity. Participants (N = 77) completed a task in which they had to respond to a "True" or "False" probe after reading true, false, identity-threatening, or non-threatening sentences. Replicating previous studies, participants reacted more slowly to a positive probe ("True") after reading false (vs. true) sentences. Notably, participants also reacted more slowly to a positive probe after reading identity-threatening (vs. non-threatening) sentences. These results provide first evidence that identity-threatening information, just as false information, is detected at a very early stage of information processing and lends support to the notion of a routine, non-strategic identity-defense mechanism.
Related Concept Videos
Protecting Self-Esteem
Understanding Deception
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Deindividuation

