Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025
Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
EUS-guided fine-needle liver biopsy in pediatric patients using a modified technique with one-pass, one-actuation wet
Javier Tejedor-Tejada1, José Nieto2, Ameya Deshmukh3
1Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, España.
Background And Aims:
Liver biopsy (LB) can be a valuable tool to determine the etiology of pediatric liver disease. There is limited data of the role of EUS-LB in children. This study evaluated the efficacy and the safety of a modified technique (M)LB in cases at high risk of bleeding or obese children. In addition, the tissue yield of EUS-(M)LB and percutaneous (PC) approach were compared.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed, comparing EUS-(M)LB and PC-LB in children at a tertiary referral center. All consecutive children referred for PC-LB and EUS-LB who had an unexplained liver test abnormality after exclusion of biliary disorders from March-2017 to August-2018 were included. EUS-(M)LB consisted of a one pass wet suction technique using a 19-gauche core needle. A comparison was performed between total specimen length (TSL) and the number of complete portal triads (CPTs).
Results:
The cohort included 28 EUS-(M)LB and 28 PC-LB pediatric cases. The median (IQR) age was 14.5 years (13.4-16). The median TSL was 8.6 (5.8-9.6) in EUS-(M)LB cases and 7 cm (7-9) in PC-LB cases (P =0.788). The maximum intact specimen was 2.8 cm (EUS-(M)LB) and 1.6 cm (PC-LB) (P =0.009). The mean (SD) number of CPTs per sample was 28.2 (7.3) and 11.6 (2.1), respectively (P =0.001). Adverse events included once case of self-limited abdominal pain in the PC-LB group.
Conclusion:
EUS-(M)LB has the potential to be a safe and effective alternative diagnostic modality when compared to PC-LB, to evaluate children with unexplained liver test abnormalities who undergo EUS to evaluate biliary disorders.
