Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 6, 2025

Combined Size and Density Fractionation of Soils for Investigations of Organo-Mineral Interactions
Published on: February 15, 2019
Revisiting Pierre Gy's formula (TOS) - A return to size-density classes for applications to contaminated soils,
Jean-Sébastien Dubé1, Kim H Esbensen2
1Laboratory for Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure (ETS). 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, H2L 3M4, Canada.
Abstract:
For some real-world material systems, estimations of the incompressible sampling variance based on Gy's classical s2(FSE) formula from the Theory of Sampling (TOS) show a significant discrepancy with empirical estimates of sampling variance. In instances concerning contaminated soils, coated particular aggregates and mixed material systems, theoretical estimates of sampling variance are larger than empirical estimates, a situation which does not have physical meaning in TOS. This has led us to revisit the development of estimates of s2(FSE) from this famous constitutional heterogeneity equation and explore the use of size-density classes for mixed material systems (mixtures of both analyte-enriched and coated particles), an approach which has been mostly unused since Gy's original derivation. This approach makes it possible to avoid taking into account the granulometric and liberation factors from Gy's classical treatment, and present grounds for criticising the use of 'standard' input values of critical parameters such as f: = 0.5, and g: = 0.25. But, as always, the "liberation factor" (l) issue still plays an important role, which is paid due attention. The constitutional heterogeneity formula based on size-density classes is presented in a form that allows for easy implementation in practice, within specified limitations. We present extensive experimental results from real-world systems. Using the "SDCD model" with published data reproduced the relative sampling variances calculated for the standard "mineral-like matrices", but more importantly corrected the relative sampling variance calculated for real contaminants by several orders of magnitudes. In all cases, the recalculated relative sampling variances were decreased to below their corresponding experimental measurements, now fully as expected from TOS, substantiating our development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Specific Gravity of Aggregate
Bulk or gross specific gravity is calculated by taking the ratio of the mass of aggregates in the saturated surface-dry state to the total volume that includes both the solids and the voids within the...
Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control
The obtained precipitate should be either a pure substance of known composition or easily converted to one by a simple process, such as ignition or drying. In addition, the precipitate should be insoluble and easily filterable. In general, filterability...
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves
Bulk Density of Aggregate
Most natural mineral aggregates, like sand and gravel,...

