Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

08:33
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
7.2K
A Method for Cheating Indication in Unproctored On-Line Exams.
Dan Komosny1, Saeed Ur Rehman2
1Department of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 22, 2022
Summary
This study introduces an automated method to detect cheating in online exams by analyzing student IP geolocation and online activity. The system identifies potential academic dishonesty in unproctored assessments, aiding educators in maintaining exam integrity.
Area of Science:
- Educational Technology
- Computer Science
- Criminology
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid shift to online education, including assessments.
- Manual detection of student dishonesty in unproctored online exams presents a significant workload for academics.
- Existing methods for ensuring academic integrity in remote learning environments are often insufficient.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an automated method for detecting cheating in unproctored online examinations.
- To assess the feasibility of using student online traces, including IP geolocation, for identifying imposters.
- To quantify and compare cheating risk scores across different courses and academic terms.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of student online traces logged by distance education systems.
- Utilization of customized IP geolocation data to derive a cheating risk score.
- Application of the method to approximately 3600 students across 22 courses with unproctored online exams.
Main Results:
- The study successfully applied the developed method to identify cheating risk scores among a large student cohort.
- Examples of indicated cheating instances were presented, demonstrating the method's practical application.
- Cheating risk scores were compared across four academic terms, including periods of university closure due to COVID-19.
Conclusions:
- The proposed automated method effectively indicates potential cheating in unproctored online exams.
- The system provides valuable data for selecting students for knowledge re-validation and comparing cheating trends.
- The findings offer insights into academic integrity challenges exacerbated by the shift to remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
16.1K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.1K
Reliability and Validity
13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Ethics in Research
24.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.7K
Blind Procedures
12.3K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.3K
Social Loafing
36.5K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.5K
Understanding Deception
13
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
13

