Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...

Cultural Influences on Personality

Cultural Influences on Personality

Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

Alfred Binet, along with his student Théophile Simon, was tasked by the French Ministry of Education in 1904 to create a method for identifying students who struggled to learn through conventional classroom instruction. This initiative aimed to address overcrowding by placing such students in specialized schools. Binet and Simon developed an intelligence test comprising 30 tasks, ranging from simple commands, like touching one's nose or ear, to more complex tasks, such as drawing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The practical relevance of WHODAS self-ratings in non-aggressive community dwelling individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders.

Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)·2026

Same author

Emotion recognition misclassification patterns in individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders and history of interpersonal aggression.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026

Same author

Co-expression-based models improve eQTL predictions for transcriptome-wide association studies and highlight new schizophrenia-associated genes.

Nature genetics·2026

Same author

Triage urgency criteria for patients on the high security waiting list.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2026

Same author

Outcomes after specialized rehabilitation for patients with critical COVID-19 and prolonged intensive care unit stays.

European clinical respiratory journal·2026

Same author

[The psychiatric care situation of mentally ill offenders in prison-Results of a survey of the DGPPN].

Der Nervenarzt·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Criminal responsibility evaluations: Benchmarking in different countries.

Claudia Pouls¹, Inge Jeandarme¹, Hasanen Al-Taiar²

¹Knowledge Center Forensic Psychiatric Care, OPZC Rekem, Daalbroekstraat 106, 3621 Rekem, Belgium.

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

|January 23, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic mental health evaluations for criminal responsibility vary significantly worldwide. While some nations offer exemplary models, global standards for these critical assessments require improvement.

Keywords:

Criminal responsibility Forensic psychiatric evaluation Forensic psychiatric expert Forensic psychiatry Insanity defense

More Related Videos

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

Published on: November 3, 2016

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

Published on: November 3, 2016

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Legal Psychology
Criminal Justice

Background:

Forensic mental health experts are vital for criminal responsibility evaluations.
Concerns exist regarding the quality and consistency of these assessments.
International disparities in legal frameworks and procedures have been noted.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and compare international legal frameworks and procedures for forensic mental health assessments.
To identify best practices and areas for improvement in criminal responsibility evaluations.

Main Methods:

A comprehensive literature review was conducted.
Comparative analysis of legal frameworks and assessment procedures across different countries.

Main Results:

Significant variations exist globally in legal standards and methodologies for forensic mental health evaluations.
Certain countries demonstrate advanced practices, serving as potential models for others.
Overall, there is a recognized need for enhancement in the quality and standardization of these assessments.

Conclusions:

International collaboration and adoption of best practices are necessary to improve forensic mental health evaluations.
Standardization efforts can enhance the reliability and validity of criminal responsibility assessments worldwide.