Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health
Tahereh Shafaghat1, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi Zarchi2, Mohammad Hasan Imani Nasab3
1Student Research Committee, Department of Health Care Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Background:
All policies and decisions need evidence examined by scientific methods. Moving toward evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) as a change in organizations, especially health systems (HSs), is inevitable. This study was conducted to identify the factors affecting EBDM in HSs from two approaches and to score them.
Materials And Methods:
A mixed-method study was carried out using the force field analysis regarding the change toward EBDM in HS in 2020. This study included six steps to identify and score the key driving forces (DFs) and restraining forces (RFs) to change toward the EBDM in HS: first, finding forces from literature; second, selecting key DFs and RFs through focus group discussion; third, scoring the first group of DFs and RFs by the experts through electronic forms; fourth, determining key DFs and RFs from the managers' perspective using qualitative interviews; fifth, scoring the second group of DFs and RFs by the experts; and sixth, comparison between forces resulted from two approaches.
Results:
According to the literature and experts' opinions, "relevant, reliable, interpretable, and understandable evidence" and "interaction between researchers and decision-makers" were the strongest forces to change, and "lack of organizational commitment and support" and "lack of relevant/high-quality evidence" were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS. Further, based on managers' perspective and scores by the experts, "suitable supervision and control" and "reforming the planning and decision-making system" were the strongest forces to change, and "inadequate knowledge of the managers and staff about the principles and contents of EBDM" and "issues beyond the authorities of managers" were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS.
Conclusions:
Based on the findings, HSs' managers can focus to reduce RFs and promote DFs for implementing EBDM strategies, so they can provide better services by making more efficient decisions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Framing Effects
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

