Comparison of Long-term Stereoacuity Improvement Between Patients With Initial Subnormal Stereopsis and Nil...

To compare improvement in long-term stereoacuity between patients with refractive accommodative esotropia (RAET) with initial subnormal stereopsis (between 120 and 1,980 arcsec of stereoacuity) and nil stereopsis.

The medical records of patients 4 years and older who had RAET with initial subnormal stereopsis and nil stereopsis and a minimum follow-up period of 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Improvement in stereoacuity at the last follow-up visit and the factors that could influence it were compared between the initial subnormal stereopsis and the nil stereopsis groups.

A total of 79 patients (mean age: 6.3 ± 1.9 years) were included: 31 patients with initial subnormal stereopsis and 48 patients with nil stereopsis. The mean follow-up time was 11.7 ± 1.8 years (range: 5 to 21 years). At the last follow-up visit, a statistically significantly greater number of patients with initial subnormal stereopsis demonstrated improvement in stereoacuity and also achieved 60 arcsec of stereoacuity compared with those with nil stereopsis. Age at onset, duration of esodeviation, mean hyperopia, amblyopia, anisometropia, and follow-up duration were not significantly different between the initial subnormal stereopsis and the nil stereopsis groups. The initial mean near and distance deviations with hyperopic correction were significantly smaller in patients with initial subnormal stereopsis. A significantly greater number of patients with initial sub-normal stereopsis had fusion at distance.

Patients with RAET with initial subnormal stereopsis have greater chances of stereoacuity improvement and recovery of 60 arcsec of stereoacuity than those with nil stereopsis. Patients who initially have nil stereopsis may develop normal stereoacuity. Smaller initial deviations with hyperopic correction and fusion at distance indicate a favorable prognosis for stereoacuity improvement. [.