Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surrounding space associations affect attentional orienting and visual discrimination in frontal field.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Development of enumeration processes for kindergarten children: Evidence from eye-tracking data.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2026
Same author

Seeing through space and time: Comparing the effects of exogenous spatial and rhythmic temporal attention on visual awareness.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Exploring spatial and temporal constraints in suppression of distractors.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Unifying temporal preparation: The temporal preparation task (TEP-Task).

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Alterations in Response Switching in Parkinson's Disease: New Insights Into Cueing.

Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology·2024
Same journal

Subtitle Engagement Varies with Audio-Subtitle Language-Script Pairing: Evidence from Hindi-English Bilinguals with an English-Medium Instruction Background.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Ultra-Early OCT Changes After Intravitreal Injection: Evidence Consistent with Transient Mechanical Compression.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

A Cerebral Basis for Visual Discomfort and Visual Stress.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Practice Effects and the Lanthony D15.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Wouldn't It Be Nice to Not Fall for It Twice? Prior Experience Does Not Abolish the Impact of Expectancy Violations on Attention Capture.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Treatment for Convergence Insufficiency with a New Digital Mobile Platform: A Comparative Preliminary Study.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task.

Rébaï Soret1, Pom Charras2, Christophe Hurter3

  • 1ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, 31400 Toulouse, France.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Covert attention processing differs for front vs. mirror visual information, impacting spatial orienting. Faster response times were observed for targets in front space, suggesting distinct cognitive processes for attending to different spatial locations.

Keywords:
Posner paradigmattentional orientingdiscrimination taskeye trackingfront spacerear spacespatial cognitionvirtual reality

More Related Videos

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.2K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

586

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.2K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

586

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Covert attention research indicates distinct visual processing for front vs. mirror (rear space) information.
  • This suggests specialized attentional mechanisms for front and rear spatial awareness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of attentional orienting in front and rear space using visual or auditory endogenous cues.
  • To determine if spatial location influences covert attention and response times.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-one participants completed a modified Posner paradigm in a virtual reality spaceship discrimination task.
  • An integrated eye tracker monitored covert attention, ensuring no overt eye movements.
  • Response times and target identification accuracy were recorded.

Main Results:

  • Informative cues led to faster response times compared to non-informative cues.
  • Targets presented in front space yielded quicker response times than those in rear space.
  • No significant impact on target identification accuracy was found.
  • Eye movement data confirmed participants relied on covert, not overt, attention.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support a differentiation in cognitive orienting processes for front and rear spatial attention.
  • Response time differences suggest distinct attentional mechanisms for processing stimuli in different spatial locations.
  • Covert attention, not overt eye movements, was the primary mechanism for performance enhancement in this task.