Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Collecting And Measuring Wound Exudate Biochemical Mediators In Surgical Wounds
Published on: October 20, 2012
Antimicrobial stewardship in wound care implementation and measuring outcomes: results of an e-survey
Karen Ousey1,2,3,4,5, Mark Rippon6, Alan Rogers7
1Professor of Skin Integrity, Director for the Institute of Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Huddersfield, UK.
Objective:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) occurs (as a result of misuse, such as over-prescribing) when certain pathogens fail to respond to treatment with antimicrobials. Consequently, patients can become severely ill and possibly die. A strategy referred to as antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) has been introduced which reduces the impact of this antimicrobial misuse. To explore health professionals' (working in wound care, treating both acute and hard-to-heal wounds) position in terms of the following: awareness of AMS; if they are aware of AMS, if they implement procedures to support its practice; and if they implement AMS, do they measure its impact by and compare pre- and post-implementation?
Method:
An e-survey designed to explore health professionals' awareness of AMS and its implications for wound care.
Results:
There were 987 respondents to the survey. The majority were specialist wound care nurses, mainly based in the UK or the US and Canada. A high proportion of those surveyed were completely/partially aware (35.1/57.9%, respectively) of AMS, and almost all implemented strategies to reduce antimicrobial prescribing. Of those surveyed, 36% took steps to measure the impact of AMS, and as a result 35.2% reported positive impacts (for example, cost reductions, a reduction in the systemic use of antimicrobials, a reduction in the topical use of antimicrobials and a reduced level of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms). Challenging aspects of AMS implementation were reported by 33.2% of respondents (for example, poorer clinical outcomes in terms of healing and increased costs). The data highlighted that 40.49% felt that AMS would be 'easy' or 'very easy' to implement while 21.73% felt that AMS would be 'difficult' or 'very difficult' to implement.
Conclusion:
Education strategies need to be devised to raise awareness and support health professionals, including wound care practitioners, to understand and implement effective AMS programmes. Development of clear metrics is required to evaluate the effect of AMS programmes in clinical practice.
Insights
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is crucial for wound care. While most health professionals are aware and implement AMS strategies, measuring impact and improving education are key to enhancing its effectiveness in reducing antimicrobial resistance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Infectious Diseases
- Wound Care Management
Background:
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to patient health and necessitates strategies like antimicrobial stewardship (AMS).
- Effective AMS programs are vital in wound care settings to combat the misuse of antimicrobials and mitigate the rise of AMR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess health professionals' awareness and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in wound care.
- To explore the extent to which AMS practices are measured and their impact evaluated by healthcare providers treating acute and hard-to-heal wounds.
Main Methods:
- An electronic survey was distributed to healthcare professionals involved in wound care.
- The survey collected data on awareness, implementation, and impact measurement of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices.
Main Results:
- Nearly all 987 respondents implemented strategies to reduce antimicrobial prescribing, with high awareness of AMS (35.1% completely, 57.9% partially).
- Only 36% measured AMS impact, though 35.2% reported positive outcomes like cost reduction and decreased antimicrobial use.
- Challenges included poorer healing outcomes and increased costs for 33.2% of respondents, while implementation ease varied (40.49% easy, 21.73% difficult).
Conclusions:
- Enhanced education is needed to improve understanding and implementation of AMS programs among wound care practitioners.
- Development of standardized metrics is essential for effectively evaluating the impact of AMS in clinical practice and combating antimicrobial resistance.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management

