Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

10:04
Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection
Published on: February 12, 2022
10.9K
Risk profiling of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by measuring circulating tumor DNA.
Alex F Herrera1, Samuel Tracy2, Brandon Croft2
1City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
Blood Advances
|January 27, 2022
Summary
High levels of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) indicate a higher risk of disease progression. Monitoring ctDNA changes can help identify patients likely to achieve remission after treatment.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) presents heterogeneous outcomes with limited durable remissions using standard therapies.
- Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a sensitive biomarker with potential prognostic value in R/R DLBCL.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess baseline ctDNA levels for identifying R/R DLBCL patients at high risk of relapse after polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (BR) or BR alone.
- To evaluate ctDNA as a prognostic and monitoring tool in transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL patients who received at least one prior therapy.
Main Methods:
- A ctDNA assay using a customized panel of recurrently mutated DLBCL genes measured mutant molecules per mL (MMPM) at baseline and end of treatment (EOT).
- Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in subgroups stratified by baseline ctDNA and log-fold change in ctDNA at EOT versus baseline.
- Biomarker-evaluable patients (n=33) had baseline ctDNA correlated with clinical factors like LDH, prior therapies, stage, and IPI.
Main Results:
- High baseline ctDNA (above median MMPM) was independently prognostic for shorter PFS (aHR, 0.18) and OS (aHR, 0.20) after adjusting for key prognostic factors.
- Baseline ctDNA levels correlated with established prognostic markers including LDH, number of prior therapies, stage, and IPI.
- A significantly greater decrease in ctDNA MMPM from baseline to EOT was observed in patients achieving complete response (CR) (n=13) compared to those without CR (n=10) (P=.0025).
Conclusions:
- Baseline ctDNA assessment effectively identifies R/R DLBCL patients at high risk of progression.
- ctDNA shows promise as a tool for monitoring treatment response and guiding management in R/R DLBCL.
- Further evaluation of ctDNA as a monitoring tool in R/R DLBCL is warranted.

