Glycemic Control in Relation to Technology Use in a Single-Center Cohort of Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Alexandra Sawyer1, Marisa Sobczak2, Gregory P Forlenza3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Insights

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pumps significantly improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems further lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, but disparities in technology access exist.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Diabetes Technology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Technological advancements in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pumps, are increasingly adopted by pediatric populations.
  • These technologies have the potential to significantly impact glycemic control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utilization of T1D technologies (CGM, insulin pumps, hybrid closed-loop systems) in a pediatric cohort.
  • To assess the impact of these technologies on glycemic control, measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 4003 T1D patients (<22 years old) at the Barbara Davis Center (Jan 2018-Dec 2020).
  • Patients were categorized by technology use: multiple daily injection/blood glucose meter (MDI/BGM), pump/BGM, MDI/CGM, and pump/CGM.
  • Glycemic control (HbA1c) was compared using ANCOVA, controlling for diabetes duration, race, and insurance.

Main Results:

  • Pump/CGM users (49.8%) had the lowest mean HbA1c (8.1%), followed by MDI/CGM users (15.4%, HbA1c 8.6%).
  • Both MDI/CGM and pump/CGM users achieved significantly lower HbA1c levels compared to MDI/BGM users (P < 0.0001).
  • Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) technology within pump/CGM users was associated with the lowest HbA1c (7.6%) and higher rates of achieving HbA1c < 7.0% (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • CGM use is associated with improved glycemic control in both MDI and pump users.
  • Insulin pump use demonstrates a significant benefit for glycemic control only when combined with CGM.
  • Hybrid closed-loop systems offer the most significant glycemic benefits, but disparities in access based on language and race/ethnicity require attention to reduce inequities in T1D care.

Related Concept Videos

Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational01:22

Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

Type 2 diabetes, characterized by insulin resistance, arises when the insulin receptors on cells lose responsiveness to insulin, diminishing the cell's capacity to take up glucose, resulting in elevated blood glucose levels. To receive a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, a series of blood glucose tests are necessary to assess whether the blood glucose falls within normal parameters. If the result is out of the normal range, a patient may be diagnosed as prediabetic or diabetic, depending on the...
3.1K
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype01:22

Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood glucose levels due to inadequate insulin production, insulin resistance, or both. The condition affects millions worldwide and can significantly impact their health and quality of life.
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
3.4K
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy01:15

Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy

The therapy for diabetes aims to alleviate hyperglycemia-related symptoms, prevent acute metabolic decompensation, and reduce chronic end-organ complications. Glycemic control is evaluated through short-term (self-monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring) and long-term (A1c, fructosamine) metrics, enabling near real-time tracking of blood glucose levels and reflecting glycemic control over specific time frames.
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
428
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects01:16

Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects

Insulin-replacement therapy usually includes both long-acting insulin (basal) and short-acting insulin (to cater to postprandial needs). In a diverse group of type 1 diabetes patients, the average daily insulin dose is typically 0.5-0.7 units/kg body weight. However, obese patients and pubertal adolescents may need more due to insulin resistance.
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
294
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones01:26

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

Biguanides, particularly metformin (Glucophage), are insulin sensitizers that enhance glucose uptake, thereby reducing insulin resistance. Unlike sulfonylureas, metformin doesn't prompt insulin secretion, which helps to curb hypoglycemia risk. Metformin is beneficial in treating conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome due to its insulin-resistance reduction capability. The drug's primary action involves curtailing hepatic gluconeogenesis, a significant contributor to high blood...
328
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides01:06

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides

Repaglinide (Prandin) and Nateglinide (Starlix), known as glinides, are oral insulin secretagogues that stimulate insulin release from pancreatic β cells by closing the ATP-sensitive potassium channels (KATP channel). Repaglinide controls insulin release from pancreatic β cells by managing potassium efflux. It shares two binding sites with sulfonylureas and also has a unique site, indicating overlapping mechanisms of action. With a rapid onset and a 4-7 hour duration, it effectively...
290