Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Glycemic Control in Relation to Technology Use in a Single-Center Cohort of Children with Type 1 Diabetes
Alexandra Sawyer1, Marisa Sobczak2, Gregory P Forlenza3
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Insights
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pumps significantly improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems further lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, but disparities in technology access exist.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Diabetes Technology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Technological advancements in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pumps, are increasingly adopted by pediatric populations.
- These technologies have the potential to significantly impact glycemic control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utilization of T1D technologies (CGM, insulin pumps, hybrid closed-loop systems) in a pediatric cohort.
- To assess the impact of these technologies on glycemic control, measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 4003 T1D patients (<22 years old) at the Barbara Davis Center (Jan 2018-Dec 2020).
- Patients were categorized by technology use: multiple daily injection/blood glucose meter (MDI/BGM), pump/BGM, MDI/CGM, and pump/CGM.
- Glycemic control (HbA1c) was compared using ANCOVA, controlling for diabetes duration, race, and insurance.
Main Results:
- Pump/CGM users (49.8%) had the lowest mean HbA1c (8.1%), followed by MDI/CGM users (15.4%, HbA1c 8.6%).
- Both MDI/CGM and pump/CGM users achieved significantly lower HbA1c levels compared to MDI/BGM users (P < 0.0001).
- Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) technology within pump/CGM users was associated with the lowest HbA1c (7.6%) and higher rates of achieving HbA1c < 7.0% (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- CGM use is associated with improved glycemic control in both MDI and pump users.
- Insulin pump use demonstrates a significant benefit for glycemic control only when combined with CGM.
- Hybrid closed-loop systems offer the most significant glycemic benefits, but disparities in access based on language and race/ethnicity require attention to reduce inequities in T1D care.
Abstract:
Technology for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pumps, and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems, is improving, being used more commonly in the pediatric population, and impacts glycemic control. We evaluated the use of these technologies and their impact on glycemic control among patients with T1D who were seen at the Barbara Davis Center (n = 4003) between January 2018 and December 2020, <22 years old, with diabetes duration >3 months. Data were analyzed by age group and technology-use group defined as multiple daily injection with blood glucose meter (MDI/BGM), pump with BGM (pump/BGM), MDI with CGM (MDI/CGM), and pump with CGM (pump/CGM). Glycemic control was compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and controlling for diabetes duration, race, and insurance. Among 4003 patients, 20% used MDI/BGM (mean hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] = 10.0%); 14.4% used pump/BGM (mean HbA1c = 10.0%); 15.4% used MDI/CGM (mean HbA1c = 8.6%); and 49.8% used pump/CGM (mean HbA1c = 8.1%). Compared with MDI/BGM patients, MDI/CGM and pump/CGM users had a lower HbA1c and were more likely to reach an HbA1c <7.0% (all P < 0.0001). Among pump/CGM users, 35% used HCL technology (mean HbA1c = 7.6%) and had a lower HbA1c and were more likely to reach an HbA1c <7% than non-HCL users (P < 0.001). CGM use was associated with a lower HbA1c in both MDI and pump users. Pump use was only associated with a lower HbA1c if used with CGM. HCL was associated with the lowest HbA1c. Spanish language and minority race/ethnicity were associated with lower rates of pump and CGM use, highlighting the need to reduce disparities.
More Related Videos
06:46A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides