Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

1.9K
Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
1.9K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

26
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
26

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Adjustments of balance control during cognitive dual tasking: Evidence from event-related force-plate analysis.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Crossmodal response precueing: age-related differences in action preparation.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2025
Same author

forceplate: An R package for processing raw force-plate time-series data.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Age-related Electrophysical Correlates of Cross-modal Attention Switching.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2024
Same author

Inhibition of cued but not executed task sets depends on cue-task compatibility and practice.

Psychological research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.

Erik Friedgen1, Iring Koch2, Denise Nadine Stephan2

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17/19, D-52066, Aachen, Germany. erik.friedgen@psych.rwth-aachen.de.

Memory & Cognition
|February 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Modality compatibility (MC) effects on task switching are independent of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. This suggests MC influences either task or response selection, but not both processes interactively.

Keywords:
Modality compatibilityS-R compatibilityTask switching

More Related Videos

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.5K
Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.5K
Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Modality compatibility (MC) is the congruence between stimulus and response modalities.
  • Switching between incompatible modality mappings incurs greater costs than compatible ones.
  • The precise stage at which MC influences cognitive processing remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether modality compatibility (MC) interacts with stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility.
  • To determine if MC influences task selection, response selection, or both.
  • To elucidate the timing of MC effects within cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using manual or vocal responses to visual and auditory stimuli.
  • Experiment 1 employed a Simon task with task-irrelevant stimulus location.
  • Experiment 2 used a task-relevant stimulus location with element-level S-R compatibility manipulations.

Main Results:

  • Independent effects of S-R compatibility and MC were observed in both experiments.
  • Bayes factors provided moderate evidence for the absence of an interaction between MC and S-R compatibility.
  • No significant interaction was found, suggesting separate processing pathways.

Conclusions:

  • Modality compatibility (MC) effects appear to operate independently of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility.
  • MC likely influences cognitive processes either before or after response selection, or potentially both, but not interactively.
  • Proposed mechanism involves anticipatory activation of modality-specific sensory effects during motor response initiation.