Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

10:42
Oral Biofilm Sampling for Microbiome Analysis in Healthy Children
Published on: December 31, 2017
17.3K
Reporting Sample Size Calculation in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in 4 Orthodontic Journals
Marialicia Calderon-Augusto1, Carlos Flores-Mir2, Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén1
1Department of Orthodontics, Universidad Científica del Sur School of Dentistry, Lima, Perú.
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
|February 3, 2022
Summary
Most orthodontic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) report sample size calculations, but many fail to adequately describe the parameters. This highlights a need for improved reporting standards in orthodontic research.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Clinical Research Methodology
Background:
- Sample size calculations are crucial for the validity and reliability of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
- Inadequate reporting of sample size parameters can compromise the interpretability of research findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reporting quality of sample size calculations in orthodontic randomized clinical trials.
- To identify common deficiencies in the description of sample size calculation parameters.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed 142 RCTs published between 2015-2019 in top-tier orthodontic journals.
- Two experienced orthodontists evaluated the reporting of sample size calculations and their key components: significance level, power, effect size, and variability.
Main Results:
- 120 (84.5%) RCTs reported sample size calculations, but only 70 (58.3%) fully detailed all necessary parameters.
- Common omissions included reporting of confidence level, test power, effect size, and expected variability, with varying frequencies across journals.
Conclusions:
- Randomized clinical trials in leading orthodontic journals often lack comprehensive reporting of sample size calculation parameters.
- There is a need to enhance the transparency and completeness of sample size reporting in orthodontic research to ensure methodological rigor.

