Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
6.6K
Outcome Evaluation of Mandibular Pull-Through Approach for Glossectomies
Elroy Saldanha1, Sanjay M Desai1, Dhruv G Patel1
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, MP India.
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
|February 3, 2022
Summary
The mandibular pull-through approach for tongue cancer surgery offers good tumor access and functional outcomes. This technique is superior to mandibular lip-split surgery for advanced cases, especially with submucosal fibrosis.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Head and Neck Cancer Research
- Oral Cancer Treatment
Background:
- Advanced tongue carcinoma in the Indian subcontinent is often complicated by submucosal fibrosis (SMF) due to betel quid chewing.
- Effective surgical techniques are crucial for managing these complex cases, balancing tumor resection with functional preservation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the functional and survival outcomes of the mandibular pull-through approach for total or near-total glossectomy in patients with advanced tongue carcinoma.
- To compare the efficacy of the mandibular pull-through approach with the traditional mandibular lip-split surgery in the Indian context.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 77 patients with advanced tongue carcinoma who underwent total or near-total glossectomy via the mandibular pull-through approach.
- Surgical assessment included operative time, margin status, reconstruction methods (PMMC, FRAFF, ALT flaps), and postoperative complications.
- Functional outcomes (decannulation, discharge, NG tube removal, speech) and survival outcomes (recurrence rates) were evaluated retrospectively.
Main Results:
- The mandibular pull-through approach demonstrated short operative times (≤30 min in 79%), clear margins (>5 mm in 90%), and manageable complication rates (e.g., surgical site infection 6.5%, partial flap loss 7.8%).
- High rates of decannulation (94%), discharge (92%), and successful NG tube removal (89% within 21 POD) were observed.
- Good speech outcomes were achieved in 52% of patients, with low long-term recurrence rates (9% local, 11% regional).
Conclusions:
- The mandibular pull-through approach provides excellent tumor accessibility with minimal mutilation, shorter operation times, and fewer postoperative complications.
- This technique offers better aesthetics and functional results compared to mandibular lip-split surgery for advanced tongue cancers, particularly in patients with SMF.
- The mandibular pull-through approach is a superior surgical option for advanced tongue and floor of mouth cancers in the Indian population, especially when combined with SMF management.

