Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

20
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
20
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

41.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.7K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.7K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.7K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K
Defining Social Psychology01:09

Defining Social Psychology

82
Social psychology investigates how the presence and actions of others influence individual behavior, cognition, and emotion. Examining the social environment's impact provides a scientific framework for understanding how individuals perceive others and are, in turn, influenced by them. This field seeks to uncover the underlying principles guiding social interactions, exploring phenomena such as conformity, obedience, and prosocial behavior.Core Themes in Social PsychologyOne central focus of...
82
Introducing Social Perception01:29

Introducing Social Perception

38
Perceiving others accurately is fundamental to effective communication and relationship-building. Social perception, a key concept in social psychology, refers to the cognitive processes through which individuals gather and interpret information about others to understand their actions, intentions, and motivations. This process extends beyond spoken words and overt behaviors, incorporating subtle nonverbal cues and contextual factors.Nonverbal Cues and Their SignificanceNonverbal cues play a...
38

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The potential of socially assistive robots during infectious disease outbreaks.

Science robotics·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Pose Generation for Social Robots in Conversational Group Formations.

Marynel Vázquez1, Alexander Lew1, Eden Gorevoy1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Frontiers in Robotics and AI
|February 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study explores two robot pose prediction methods for social human conversations. Both approaches effectively consider environmental layout and group formations, with unique strengths in avoiding obstacles and capturing formation variability.

Keywords:
F-Formationsgroup conversationshuman–robot interaction (HRI)proxemicsspatial behavior analysis

More Related Videos

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.3K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.3K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Human-Robot Interaction
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Robots participating in social human conversations require appropriate poses.
  • Environmental layout significantly influences robot pose selection in group formations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate two distinct methods for predicting robot poses in social conversational settings.
  • To assess the effectiveness of model-based and data-driven approaches in handling environmental constraints and capturing formation dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • A model-based approach explicitly encoding geometric aspects of conversational formations.
  • A data-driven approach using graph neural networks and adversarial training for implicit spatial arrangement modeling.
  • Evaluation through quantitative metrics and a human experiment.

Main Results:

  • Both methods effectively reason about environment layout and conversational group formations.
  • The geometric approach excelled at avoiding non-free space, while the data-driven method better captured formation variability.
  • Methods can be repeatedly used to simulate spatial arrangements, despite single-pose output design.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methods offer effective solutions for robot pose prediction in social contexts.
  • Different approaches have complementary strengths, suggesting potential for hybrid models.
  • Further research is needed to address open challenges in robot pose generation for dynamic social environments.