Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

823
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
823
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

1.0K
The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
1.0K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

736
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
736
Units and Standards of Measurement01:10

Units and Standards of Measurement

38.2K
A physical quantity is defined either by specifying its measurement method or by stating how it is calculated from other measurements. For example, consider a metallic cube. We might define its mass and dimensions by specifying methods for measuring them, such as using a weighing machine and a meter scale. Then, we could define the volume by stating that it is the cube of its side, and we could calculate the density as the mass divided by the volume.
Measurements of physical quantities are...
38.2K
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

775
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
775
Standard Solutions01:14

Standard Solutions

680
Standard solutions refer to solutions with a precisely known concentration or composition. A primary standard is a highly pure, high molar mass, stable substance that is entirely soluble in water, the most commonly used solvent in analytical chemistry. The primary standard solution can be used to standardize secondary standards, which are substances with known concentrations but are less pure and stable. Standard solutions are essential for achieving accurate and reliable results in analytical...
680

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case study in investigative interpretation of cell-site observations: Estimating locations of mobile telephones in the absence of survey data.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same author

Quo vadis, BGA? A collaborative EDNAP exercise on the challenges and progress in forensic biogeographical ancestry inference.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

Nothing new under the sun: The NIST primer on "Probability and Likelihood Ratios" gives a misleading negative portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2026
Same author

Rigidity Percolation Dictates Rheological Hysteresis Regime in Polypropylene during Crystallization and Melting.

Macromolecules·2026
Same author

Factors affecting recording methane emission phenotypes of composite and crossbreed beef cattle grazing tropical and subtropical rangelands of Northern Australia.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same author

Incorrect formula for calculation of likelihood ratios used in forensic anthropology: Comments on Scott & Rogers (2026).

Forensic science international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
09:29

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision

Published on: February 11, 2014

13.2K

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison1,2, Cedric Neumann3, Patrick Henry Geoghegan4,5

  • 1Forensic Data Science Laboratory & Forensic Speech Science Laboratory, Computer Science Department & Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Forensic Science International. Synergy
|February 3, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This letter addresses concerns regarding the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) standards development process. It critiques a previous response and defends the integrity of scientific standards.

Keywords:
Forensic scienceMethod validationQuality managementStandardValidation

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.4K
Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA
09:22

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA

Published on: October 31, 2011

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
09:29

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision

Published on: February 11, 2014

13.2K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.4K
Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA
09:22

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA

Published on: October 31, 2011

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Standards Development

Background:

  • This letter responds to Mohammed et al. (2021), which addressed Morrison et al. (2020).
  • The original article by Morrison et al. raised concerns about the subversion of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) standards-development process.
  • The discussion centers on the integrity and methodology of forensic science standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reply to the points raised by Mohammed et al. (2021) concerning OSAC standards.
  • To further discuss the implications of the OSAC standards-development process on forensic science.
  • To clarify and defend the position presented in Morrison et al. (2020).

Main Methods:

  • This is a Letter to the Editor, involving critical analysis and discourse.
  • The method involves responding to specific arguments and evidence presented in prior publications.
  • Re-evaluation of the OSAC standards-development process through commentary.

Main Results:

  • The letter argues against the conclusions presented by Mohammed et al. (2021).
  • It reiterates and potentially expands upon the criticisms of the OSAC process.
  • Highlights potential flaws or oversights in the response to the original critique.

Conclusions:

  • The integrity of the OSAC standards-development process remains a critical issue in forensic science.
  • Further scrutiny and open discussion are necessary to ensure robust and reliable scientific standards.
  • The letter advocates for a more transparent and rigorous approach to developing forensic science standards.