Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Palatal Flap Delay and Facial Artery Musculomucosal (FAMM) Flap for the Closure of Cocaine Fistula.

Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025
Same author

Lung recruitment with HFOV versus VTV/AC in preterm infants with RDS.

BMC pediatrics·2024
Same author

The Virtual Surgical Management of Facial Fibrous Dysplasia.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2023
Same author

Delayed complex fronto-zygomatico-orbital reconstruction using patient specific 3D printed implants; A report of three complex cases - A short communication.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2022
Same author

Accuracy of patient-specific temporal implants using PEKK.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2021
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of long term outdoor nitrogen dioxide exposure and mortality.

PloS one·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.6K

Reconstruction of Cranial Bone Defects Using Polyamide 12 Patient-Specific Implant: Long Term Follow Up.

Shereen W Arafat1, Waleed H Ibrahim2, Shady Shaker3

  • 1October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Cario.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|February 4, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Patient-specific polyamide 12 implants effectively reconstruct cranial bone defects after decompression craniectomy. This method ensures excellent cosmetic and clinical outcomes, with high patient and surgeon satisfaction.

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.6K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Neurosurgery
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Cranial bone defects often result from decompression craniectomy.
  • Reconstruction aims to restore both function and aesthetics.
  • Patient-specific implants offer tailored solutions for complex defects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of patient-specific polyamide 12 implants for cranial bone defect reconstruction.
  • To assess the clinical and esthetic outcomes of this innovative approach.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized computerized tomography (CT) for skull scanning and virtual implant planning.
  • Employed selective laser sintering (SLS) to fabricate custom polyamide 12 implants.
  • Performed cranioplasty via a coronal approach, fixating implants with mini-screws and plates.

Main Results:

  • All 10 patients achieved a Glasgow Outcome Score of 1 (good recovery).
  • High patient (10 ± 0) and surgeon (9 ± 1) satisfaction with esthetic outcomes.
  • Excellent cranial symmetry (98% ± 1%) and high accuracy (mean difference 0.3197 ± 0.1649) between planned and actual outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Patient-specific polyamide 12 implants represent a promising solution for cranial reconstruction.
  • This technique yields superior cosmetic and functional results.
  • The study demonstrates high accuracy and patient satisfaction with custom cranial implants.