Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypoxic adaptation theory of cancer.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology·2026
Same author

LobePrior segments lung lobes on computed tomography images in the presence of severe abnormalities.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Stroke Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Seminars in interventional radiology·2026
Same author

Hypothalamic Atrophy and Textural Changes in Polyglutamine Ataxias.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026
Same author

Tenofovir-induced Fanconi syndrome: a case report and literature review.

Oxford medical case reports·2026
Same author

Maternal-fetal immune conflict contributes to male-specific impairments in a mouse model of neurodevelopmental disorders.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Predicting vasovagal syncope during head-up tilt test: three machine learning approaches.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2026
Same journal

Decoding basal ganglia motor circuit dysfunction from handwriting: a physics-informed neural signal interpretation framework for Parkinson's disease screening.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2026
Same journal

FUSION-AD: interpretable AI framework for risk assessment and subgroup discovery in Alzheimer's disease.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2026
Same journal

A 3D-printed phantom to validate subject orientation in 3D imaging and recordings.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2026
Same journal

IntegriLAB: a blockchain-enabled electronic lab notebook for reproducible neuroimaging research.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2026
Same journal

Long-range correlations in alpha-band of electroencephalogram: a nonlinear embedding and detrended fluctuation analysis.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.0K

Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets.

Mariana Bento1,2,3, Irene Fantini4, Justin Park2,3,5

  • 1Electrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
|February 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning (DL) for brain imaging requires large datasets, but batch effects from varied sources can impact tool performance. Strategies like data harmonization and domain adaptation are crucial for reliable results in structural MR imaging analysis.

Keywords:
MR brain imagingbatch effectsdata aggregationdeep learningdomain adaptationmachine learningmulti-site datasets

More Related Videos

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
10:25

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping

Published on: September 25, 2019

48.5K
Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease
09:06

Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease

Published on: June 9, 2018

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.0K
Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
10:25

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping

Published on: September 25, 2019

48.5K
Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease
09:06

Whole-brain Segmentation and Change-point Analysis of Anatomical Brain MRI—Application in Premanifest Huntington's Disease

Published on: June 9, 2018

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging and Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • Large, multi-site brain imaging datasets are essential for training advanced deep learning (DL) tools for structural magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
  • Aggregating smaller datasets introduces variability, known as batch effects, stemming from diverse acquisition and processing protocols.
  • Understanding and managing batch effects is critical to ensure DL tool generalizability and avoid performance degradation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact of batch effects in deep learning applications for structural brain MR imaging.
  • To explore methods for addressing batch effects, including data harmonization and domain adaptation.
  • To discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and challenges of these approaches in multi-site neuroimaging datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Narrative review of deep learning applications in structural brain MR imaging.
  • Examination of datasets aggregated from multiple sites with varying acquisition protocols.
  • Analysis of two main approaches for managing batch effects: explicit data harmonization and implicit domain adaptation.

Main Results:

  • Batch effects can arise from equipment, imaging techniques, and processing, influencing DL tool performance both positively and negatively.
  • Data harmonization aims to explicitly minimize unwanted batch effects through standardization and quality control.
  • Domain adaptation implicitly handles batch effects by developing DL tools robust to variations.

Conclusions:

  • Both data harmonization and domain adaptation offer distinct strategies for managing batch effects in brain imaging DL.
  • Careful consideration of batch effect impacts is necessary to ensure DL tool outputs reflect true pathology, not data artifacts.
  • Future research should address key challenges in developing robust and generalizable DL tools for heterogeneous neuroimaging data.