Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

False Memories01:18

False Memories

163
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
163
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

366
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
366
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.0K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.0K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

12
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
12

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Military Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Predicts Greater Negative Metacognitive Bias.

The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Emulated trial of artificial intelligence use and subsequent depressive outcomes in a survey of US adults.

BMJ mental health·2026
Same author

Subjective cognitive concerns and global metacognitive bias in prodromal Parkinson's and Parkinson's disease without cognitive impairment.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Anxiety/stress symptoms uniquely predict greater negative global metacognitive bias in post-9/11 veterans.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2026
Same author

How deceptive online networks reached millions in the US 2020 elections.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Perceptual heterogeneity in developmental prosopagnosia: The role of the right OFA.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.5K

The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability.

Briony Swire-Thompson1, Nicholas Miklaucic1, John P Wihbey2

  • 1Network Science Institute.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|February 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Correcting misinformation did not increase belief more than a control, challenging the backfire effect. Item reliability, not worldview, predicted backfire rates, suggesting caution in interpreting past findings.

More Related Videos

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.5K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • The backfire effect, where corrections amplify misconceptions, is often cited as a reason to withhold corrective information.
  • Previous research suggests backfire effects may be unreliable and difficult to replicate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if correcting misinformation increases belief more than a no-correction control.
  • To examine if item-level backfire rates correlate with test-retest reliability and factors like perceived importance, belief strength, novelty, and illusory truth.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments with longitudinal pre/post designs (N=388, N=532).
  • Participants rated 21 misinformation items and were assigned to correction or test-retest control conditions.

Main Results:

  • No items showed increased belief in the correction condition compared to controls.
  • Item backfire rates strongly negatively correlated with reliability (ρ = -.61/-.73).
  • Familiarity attributes correlated with backfire, but reliability was a stronger predictor.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a potential explanation for the poor replicability of backfire effects.
  • Future research must use reliable measures and account for reliability in analyses.
  • Fact-checkers should not refrain from providing corrective information due to backfire concerns.