Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Precision Trial Drawer, a Computational Tool to Assist Planning of Genomics-Driven Trials in Oncology
Giorgio E M Melloni1, Alessandro Guida1, Giuseppe Curigliano1
1Giorgio E.M. Melloni, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Giorgio E.M. Melloni and Laura Riva, Italian Institute of Technology; Alessandro Guida, Giuseppe Curigliano, Angela Esposito, Piergiuseppe Pelicci, and Luca Mazzarella, European Institute of Oncology; Giuseppe Curigliano and Piergiuseppe Pelicci, University of Milan, Milan; Alberto Magi, University of Florence, Florence; Ruggero de Maria, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Edoardo Botteri, Norwegian Tumor Registry, Oslo, Norway; and Maude Kamal and Christoph Le Tourneau, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Purpose:
Trials that accrue participants on the basis of genetic biomarkers are a powerful means of testing targeted drugs, but they are often complicated by the rarity of the biomarker-positive population. Umbrella trials circumvent this by testing multiple hypotheses to maximize accrual. However, bigger trials have higher chances of conflicting treatment allocations because of the coexistence of multiple actionable alterations; allocation strategies greatly affect the efficiency of enrollment and should be carefully planned on the basis of relative mutation frequencies, leveraging information from large sequencing projects.
Methods:
We developed software named Precision Trial Drawer (PTD) to estimate parameters that are useful for designing precision trials, most importantly, the number of patients needed to molecularly screen (NNMS) and the allocation rule that maximizes patient accrual on the basis of mutation frequency, systematically assigning patients with conflicting allocations to the drug associated with the rarer mutation. We used data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to show their potential in a 10-arm imaginary trial of multiple cancers on the basis of genetic alterations suggested by the past Molecular Analysis for Personalised Therapy (MAP) conference. We validated PTD predictions versus real data from the SHIVA (A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Therapy Based on Tumor Molecular Profiling Versus Conventional Therapy in Patients With Refractory Cancer) trial.
Results:
In the MAP imaginary trial, PTD-optimized allocation reduces number of patients needed to molecularly screen by up to 71.8% (3.5 times) compared with nonoptimal trial designs. In the SHIVA trial, PTD correctly predicted the fraction of patients with actionable alterations (33.51% [95% CI, 29.4% to 37.6%] in imaginary v 32.92% [95% CI, 28.2% to 37.6%] expected) and allocation to specific treatment groups (RAS/MEK, PI3K/mTOR, or both).
Conclusion:
PTD correctly predicts crucial parameters for the design of multiarm genetic biomarker-driven trials. PTD is available as a package in the R programming language and as an open-access Web-based app. It represents a useful resource for the community of precision oncology trialists. The Web-based app is available at https://gmelloni.github.io/ptd/shinyapp.html.
Insights
Precision Trial Drawer software optimizes patient accrual in genetic biomarker trials by improving molecular screening efficiency. This tool aids in designing multiarm precision oncology studies, reducing the number of patients needed for screening.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Biomarker-driven clinical trials are crucial for targeted therapies but face challenges with rare biomarker-positive populations.
- Umbrella trials test multiple hypotheses to enhance accrual but can have complex treatment allocations due to multiple genetic alterations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate software (Precision Trial Drawer - PTD) for optimizing the design of multiarm, genetic biomarker-driven precision oncology trials.
- To estimate key parameters like the number of patients needed to molecularly screen (NNMS) and optimize patient allocation strategies based on mutation frequencies.
Main Methods:
- Developed Precision Trial Drawer (PTD) software to calculate NNMS and design optimal allocation rules.
- Utilized The Cancer Genome Atlas data for an imaginary 10-arm trial based on MAP conference recommendations.
- Validated PTD predictions against real-world data from the SHIVA trial.
Main Results:
- PTD optimization reduced the number of patients needed to molecularly screen by up to 71.8% in an imaginary trial.
- PTD accurately predicted patient fractions with actionable alterations and treatment group allocations in the SHIVA trial.
Conclusions:
- Precision Trial Drawer (PTD) accurately predicts critical parameters for designing multiarm genetic biomarker-driven trials.
- PTD is available as an R package and an open-access web app, serving as a valuable resource for precision oncology trialists.
More Related Videos
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023