Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

04:46
'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
7.4K
Interviewer Error Within the Face-to-Face Food Frequency Questionnaire in Large Multisite Epidemiologic Studies
American Journal of Epidemiology
|February 9, 2022
Summary
Interviewer errors in food frequency questionnaires are common, affecting nearly all participants and interviewers. Addressing these errors is crucial for accurate dietary data in large studies.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Nutrition Science
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Interviewer error is a known issue in surveys.
- Its impact on face-to-face food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) in large epidemiologic studies is under-researched.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence and types of interviewer error in face-to-face FFQs.
- To identify factors contributing to interviewer error and assess its impact on dietary intake estimates.
Main Methods:
- Utilized audio-recorded dietary data from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (2018-2019).
- Identified error-prone interviews using outlier detection.
- Reviewed interviews to categorize and quantify interviewer errors (falsification, coding, reading deviation).
Main Results:
- 7.96% of questions in error-prone interviews contained interviewer errors.
- Most interviewers (98.29%) and respondents (73.71%) had at least one error.
- Errors were more frequent in complex questions (e.g., food quantification, seasonal foods).
- Correcting errors reduced estimated mean and standard deviation of food intakes.
Conclusions:
- Interviewer error significantly impacts face-to-face FFQ data quality.
- Targeted monitoring of high-error interviewers and respondents is needed.
- Simplifying questionnaire design may reduce survey burden and errors.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
761
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
761
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
294
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
294
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
3.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
3.7K
Study Designs in Epidemiology
477
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
477
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
8
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
8
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
5
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
5

