Ambulatory Heart Rate Variability Monitoring: Comparisons Between the Empatica E4 Wristband and Holter
Elizabeth E Van Voorhees1, Paul A Dennis, Lana L Watkins
1From the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Van Voorhees, P.A. Dennis, Patel, Calhoun, M.F. Dennis, Beckham); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center (Van Voorhees, P.A. Dennis, Watkins, Patel, Calhoun, M.F. Dennis, Beckham); Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Region Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (Calhoun, Beckham), Durham; and Durham Veterans Affairs Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care (Calhoun), Durham, North Carolina.
Objective:
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a useful index of psychological and physiological stress. Although several wristband devices have purported to measure HRV, none have demonstrated reliability when compared with the criterion-standard Holter monitor. We evaluated the reliability of HRV readings from the Empatica E4 wristband compared with a Holter monitor over a 24-hour period of simultaneous monitoring.
Methods:
Agreement between the monitors was assessed by examining correlations and intraclass correlations (ICCs) for fixed sets in 13 individuals in a treatment trial for posttraumatic stress disorder (4 women; mean [standard deviation] age = 51.92 [6.17] years). Agreement was calculated at 1-second and 5-minute intervals for interbeat intervals (IBIs) and for 5-minute intervals of the root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats (RMSSD) and standard deviation of all normal R-R intervals (SDNN). Agreement across the entire 24-hour observation period was also measured. Frequency-domain measures of HRV could not be calculated because of too much missing data from the E4.
Results:
Although high interdevice correlations and ICCs were observed between the E4 and Holter monitors for IBIs at 1-second (median r = 0.88; median ICC = 0.87) and 5-minute (median r = 0.94; median ICC = 0.94) intervals, reliabilities for 5-minute RMSSD (median r = -0.09; median ICC = -0.05) and 5-minute SDNN (median r = 0.48; median ICC = 0.47) were poor. Agreement between the devices on 24-hour measures of HRV was satisfactory (IBI: r = 0.97, ICC = 0.97; RMSSD: r = 0.77, IBI = 0.76; SDNN: r = 0.92, IBI = 0.89).
Conclusions:
Findings suggest that the low reliability of Empatica E4 as compared with the Holter monitor does not justify its use in ambulatory research for the measurement of HRV over time periods of 5 minutes or less.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
01:30Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
01:29Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
01:25Correlation between ECG and Cardiac Cycle
A cardiac action potential originates in the SA node and spreads throughout the atria and the AV node in approximately 0.03 seconds. This results in the P wave in an ECG and triggers atrial contraction. The action potential is then briefly slowed at the AV node, allowing the atria to contract and fill the ventricles with blood before...
01:30Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
01:28Electrocardiogram Fundamentals
An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a diagnostic tool for identifying cardiac conditions such as arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, and myocardial ischemia.
Definition
An electrocardiogram (ECG) visualizes the heart's electrical activity by tracing the electrical movement associated with each heartbeat on a graph or monitor. As the heart beats, an electrical wave passes through it, correlating with the cardiac cycle events.
Parts of an ECG
An ECG utilizes electrodes on the skin...