Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
Published on: May 8, 2021
Actions of a shaken heart: Interoception interacts with action processing
Ondřej Bečev1, Eva Kozáková2, Lenka Sakálošová3
1Behavioural and Social Neuroscience, CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Clinical Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67 Klecany, Czech Republic; First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekařská 664/53, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.
Bodily arousal influences how we process actions and their effects. Unconscious bodily signals, specifically interoceptive prediction error, modulate brain responses during action-effect processing, impacting frontal P3 activity.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Psychology
Background:
- Interoception, the sense of the body's internal state, plays a crucial role in cognitive processes.
- Predictive coding frameworks suggest that the brain constantly generates predictions about sensory input, including bodily signals.
- Understanding how bodily arousal influences action processing is vital for explaining embodied cognition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the modulatory influence of unconscious bodily arousal on motor-related embodied information.
- To examine the interaction between interoceptive prediction error and event-related potentials (ERPs) in action-effect processing.
- To explore how synchronous versus false auditory cardiac feedback affects neural responses during self-initiated actions.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a task involving self-initiated or externally-triggered sounds.
- Auditory cardiac feedback was manipulated to be either synchronous or false.
- Event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically N1, P2, and P3 components, were recorded and analyzed.
Main Results:
- The interaction between interoceptive manipulation and action-effect processing modulated the frontal P3 response.
- Synchronous cardiac feedback enhanced the P3 response to self-initiated tones.
- False cardiac feedback reversed the frontal cortical response, while N1 and P2 components were affected by interoception alone.
Conclusions:
- Findings support theoretical accounts of interoception and action processing within a predictive coding framework.
- The study highlights the role of interoceptive prediction error in modulating higher stages of action processing.
- Bodily arousal significantly influences the neural mechanisms underlying the perception of self-initiated actions and their consequences.
Related Concept Videos
Location and Orientation of the Heart
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
Physiology of Emotion
Autonomic Nervous System
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a critical role in emotional responses by regulating involuntary physiological functions. It consists of two main components: the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. The sympathetic system...
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Heart Sounds
Auscultation is the process of listening to these internal body sounds using a stethoscope. The heart produces four types of sounds, but only two—S1 and S2—can usually be heard with a stethoscope.
S1, also known as the "lub" sound, is caused by the closure of atrioventricular (A-V)...

