Second primary tumor after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A case report
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

A Nonviral Approach to Generate Transient Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Using mRNA for Cancer Immunotherapy
Published on: February 21, 2025
Kang Miao1, Shuangni Yu2, Jun Ni1
1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many types of cancers. However, the effect of ICIs on second primary tumors is still unclear. Some studied have concluded that ICIs could reduce the incidence of second primary tumors, while others found an increased overall risk of second primary cancer after the introduction of ICIs to the treatment of melanoma. Here, we report the case of a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who was treated with ICIs in combination with antiangiogenic drugs, and subsequently developed a second primary tumor in the context of a favorable curative effect of the primary lung cancer. From this case, we know that good efficacy of ICIs for a primary tumor does not mean that a second primary tumor will never develop, which reminds clinicians to consider the possibility of a second primary tumor rather than treating it directly as disease progression.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can treat cancer but may increase the risk of second primary tumors. This case highlights the need for vigilance, as ICI efficacy against the primary tumor doesn't prevent new cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard cancer treatments.
- The impact of ICIs on the risk of developing second primary tumors remains uncertain.
- Conflicting evidence exists regarding whether ICIs decrease or increase second primary cancer incidence.
Observation:
- A patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received combination therapy with ICIs and antiangiogenic drugs.
- The patient experienced a favorable treatment response for the primary NSCLC.
- Despite effective primary treatment, the patient developed a second primary tumor.
Findings:
- Effective treatment of a primary cancer with ICIs does not preclude the development of a second primary tumor.
- The occurrence of a second primary tumor can be independent of the primary tumor's response to ICI therapy.
Implications:
- Clinicians must consider the possibility of second primary tumors in patients treated with ICIs.
- New or worsening symptoms in patients on ICIs should prompt evaluation for a second primary cancer, not just disease progression.
- This case underscores the complex relationship between immunotherapy and secondary oncogenesis.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Treatment Resistant Cancers

