Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.3K
Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

2.7K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intelligent Crack Detection Method Based on GM-ResNet.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Investigation of Temperature Variations and Extreme Temperature Differences for the Corrugated Web Steel Beams under Solar Radiation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Structural Damage Identification Based on Transmissibility in Time Domain.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Experimental Study of Aerodynamic Interference Effects for a Suspended Monorail Vehicle-Bridge System Using a Wireless Acquisition System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Effect of Train-Induced Wind on the Transmission of COVID-19: A New Insight into Potential Infectious Risks.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same author

Aerodynamic Performance of an Adaptive GFRP Wind Barrier Structure for Railway Bridges.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.1K

Crack Detection and Comparison Study Based on Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN.

Xiangyang Xu1, Mian Zhao1, Peixin Shi1

  • 1School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 15, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Intelligent crack detection using deep learning methods like Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN shows promise for road safety. A joint training strategy enables effective crack recognition with limited data, outperforming YOLOv3.

Keywords:
Faster R-CNNMask R-CNNcrack detectiondeep learningintelligent monitoring

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

670

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

670

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Road Infrastructure Maintenance

Background:

  • Intelligent operation and maintenance of infrastructure rely on accurate crack detection.
  • Computer vision and deep learning have advanced road pavement crack recognition.
  • Convolutional neural networks show superior performance in crack identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate deep learning for intelligent road crack detection.
  • To compare and analyze Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN for this task.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a joint training strategy.

Main Methods:

  • Deep learning algorithms, specifically Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN, were employed.
  • A comparative analysis of these models was conducted.
  • A joint training strategy was implemented and assessed.

Main Results:

  • The joint training strategy proved effective for both Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN.
  • Successful crack detection was achieved with over 130 images.
  • The proposed method outperformed YOLOv3 in crack detection.
  • Mask R-CNN's bounding box accuracy degraded with joint training.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning, particularly Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN with joint training, offers an effective solution for intelligent road crack detection.
  • This approach is viable even with limited datasets.
  • Further optimization is needed to address Mask R-CNN's bounding box performance limitations.