Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: June 28, 2018
Microbiology Assessments in Critically Ill Patients
Adrian John Brink1,2, Chad M Centner1,2, Stefan Opperman1,3
1Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Accurate microbiological assessment is crucial for critically ill patients. While rapid diagnostics offer potential benefits, more research is needed to guide their use alongside conventional methods in intensive care units (ICUs).
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- High prevalence of infections in critically ill patients contributes significantly to in-hospital mortality.
- Effective microbiological assessment is vital for appropriate diagnosis and treatment decisions in intensive care units (ICUs).
- The preanalytical phase, including specimen collection, is critical for accurate microbiological diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role and impact of conventional and novel microbiological diagnostic strategies in critically ill patients.
- To assess the advantages and limitations of rapid diagnostic tests compared to traditional methods.
- To emphasize the need for rigorous clinical evaluation before widespread adoption of new diagnostic technologies in ICUs.
Main Methods:
- Review and discussion of conventional microbiology practices, including specimen selection, collection, and laboratory processing.
- Comparison of novel rapid and panel-based diagnostic strategies with conventional methods, focusing on turnaround time and detection capabilities.
- Emphasis on the critical evaluation of clinical utility and patient benefit for rapid diagnostic tests in sepsis and shock.
Main Results:
- Conventional microbiology requires adherence to best practices, with the preanalytical phase being crucial for diagnostic accuracy.
- Novel rapid diagnostics offer faster results and broader detection, including antimicrobial resistance determinants.
- Limited robust clinical data exists for rapid diagnostic tests in presumed sepsis, sepsis, and shock, necessitating further research.
Conclusions:
- Rapid diagnostic tests show promise but cannot yet replace conventional microbiological assessments in ICUs.
- Further intervention studies are crucial to establish clear benefits, interpretation guidelines, and treatment protocols for rapid diagnostics.
- Widespread adoption requires evidence demonstrating patient benefit and alignment with antimicrobial stewardship principles.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Key Techniques in Microbiology
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

