Pulseless electrical activity and asystolic cardiac arrest in infants: identifying factors that influence outcomes
Kathryn Best1, Myra H Wyckoff2, Rong Huang3
1UT Southwestern Medical Center Department of Pediatrics Division of Critical Care Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
Insights
Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystolic cardiac arrest (CA) are uncommon in infants. Poor outcomes are linked to inotrope support and prolonged resuscitation efforts.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Neonatal Resuscitation
- Cardiology
Background:
- Limited data exists on pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystolic cardiac arrest (CA) in infants.
- Understanding incidence and outcomes is crucial for this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the incidence of PEA/asystolic CA in infants.
- To identify factors associated with outcomes in infants experiencing PEA/asystolic CA.
Main Methods:
- Single-center retrospective chart review.
- Study included infants (<1 year) with in-hospital PEA/asystolic CA from 2011-2019.
- Primary outcome: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC); Secondary outcome: survival to discharge.
Main Results:
- PEA/asystolic CA occurred in 38 of 148 infants (26%).
- ROSC was achieved in 76% (29/38) and survival to discharge in 32% (12/38).
- Inotrope support, longer chest compressions, and epinephrine administration were associated with increased mortality. Respiratory etiology predicted survival.
Conclusions:
- PEA/asystolic cardiac arrests are infrequent in infants.
- Pre-arrest inotropic support and prolonged chest compressions are poor prognostic indicators.
Background:
There is limited information on pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystolic cardiac arrest (CA) in the infant population. The aim is to describe the incidence and factors associated with outcomes in infants with PEA/asystolic CA.
Methods:
Single-center retrospective chart review study of infants less than one year of age who suffer in-hospital PEA/asystolic CA from January 1 2011 to June 30 2019. The primary outcome was the return of spontaneous circulation. The secondary outcome was survival to discharge.
Results:
CA occurred in 148 infants and PEA/asystolic was found in 38 (26%). Of those 29 (76%) achieved ROSC, and 12 (32%) survived to discharge. Infants on inotrope support or receiving longer duration of chest compressions and epinephrine had increase mortality. All infants with respiratory etiology of arrest survived to hospital discharge.
Conclusion:
PEA/asystolic CAs are uncommon. Poor prognostic indicators include the need for pre-arrest inotrope support and increased duration of chest compressions.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm


