Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

5.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
5.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.2K
Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

12.3K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
12.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.1K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.1K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

967
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
967

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systematic review and Meta-Analytic Gaussian Network Aggregation of anxious symptoms.

Clinical psychology review·2026
Same author

Mapping the network structure of dementia and its associated factors among older adults in Singapore: evidence from two national cross-sectional studies.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Mapping the dynamics of idiographic network models to the network theory of psychopathology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The invariance partial pruning approach to the network comparison in time-series and panel data.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Cultural differences in autonomy, social contacts, and sensory function for depression: A cross-national network analysis of older adults in England and South Korea.

Journal of affective disorders·2025
Same author

Correcting for selection bias after conditioning on a sum score in the Ising model.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for Gaussian Graphical Models and Centrality Indices.

Joran Jongerling1, Sacha Epskamp2,3, Donald R Williams4

  • 1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|February 18, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian graphical LASSO (GLASSO) network estimation improves accuracy for psychopathology symptom networks compared to frequentist methods. This approach better estimates symptom influences and centrality measures, offering a more reliable network analysis.

Keywords:
BayesianLASSONetworkcentralityhorseshoe

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Network Science
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • The network approach to psychopathology views psychological disorders as systems of interacting components, such as symptoms.
  • Centrality indices are used to quantify symptom influence within these networks, but estimation methods like frequentist graphical LASSO (GLASSO) face challenges with bias and uncertainty.
  • Bayesian estimation methods offer potential advantages in handling sampling distribution biases of centrality indices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of Bayesian GLASSO with Horseshoe priors against frequentist GLASSO for estimating psychopathology symptom networks.
  • To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of centrality measures derived from different estimation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Extensive simulations were conducted to compare Bayesian GLASSO (using GLASSO and Horseshoe priors) with frequentist GLASSO.
  • The study assessed bias in edge weights, centrality measures, correlation between estimated and true partial correlations, specificity, and sensitivity.
  • Coverage of uncertainty in centrality measures (strength, closeness, betweenness) was also evaluated.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian GLASSO demonstrated superior performance over the Horseshoe prior and outperformed frequentist GLASSO in reducing bias for edge weights and centrality measures.
  • The Bayesian GLASSO showed better correlation between estimated and true partial correlations and improved specificity.
  • While sensitivity was slightly better for frequentist GLASSO, Bayesian GLASSO achieved good coverage for strength and closeness centrality, though less so for betweenness centrality.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian GLASSO provides a more accurate and less biased method for estimating psychopathology symptom networks compared to frequentist GLASSO.
  • This Bayesian approach offers improved estimation of symptom influences and key centrality indices, enhancing the reliability of network analyses in psychopathology.
  • Further research may be needed to refine the estimation of betweenness centrality uncertainty within Bayesian network models.