Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
Kevin Magone1,2, Jacob Ristow2, Kyle Root3,4
1CHI Saint Joseph Medical Group - Orthopedic Associates, CHI Saint Joseph Health, London, Kentucky, USA.
Background:
Equipment used to guide surgical incisions has been shown to be a source of bacterial contamination during surgery.
Purpose/Hypothesis:
To compare the culture-positive rates of sterile marking pens used before and after skin preparation for shoulder surgery. It was hypothesized that there will be no difference in culture-positive rates from marking pens used after skin preparation compared with before skin preparation.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Overall, 43 consecutive patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery were enrolled prospectively into this study. Each patient provided 2 samples: study pens (from marking the surgical site incision after skin preparation) and positive control pens (from marking the surgical site incision before skin preparation). In addition, there were 43 negative control pens evaluated (straight from the packaging without any patient contact). Cultures were evaluated at 4 and 21 days, and all positive cultures were further evaluated for speciation, if able. Standard descriptive summaries and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the study samples.
Results:
The average age of the 43 patients was 54 years (range, 18-76 years). There were 29 (67%) female patients, and 30 (70%) procedures were on the right shoulder. Of the 43 procedures performed, 29 (67.4%) were arthroscopic, 12 (27.9%) were open, and 2 (4.7%) were closed. Of the 43 study pens, 1 culture was positive for Propionibacterium acnes (2.3%). Of the 43 positive control pens, 2 cultures were positive for bacterial growth (4.7%): P. acnes and Gram-positive bacilli (no speciation could be obtained). Of the 43 negative control pens, none of the cultures were positive for bacterial growth (0%). There was no statistical difference in the culture-positive rate between the study pens and the positive or negative control pens (P ≥ .999).
Conclusion:
Study results indicated that sterile surgical marking pens used to plan incisions and to outline anatomic landmarks did not have a higher culture-positive rate compared with pens used on unprepared skin or pens straight from the packaging.
Clinical Relevance:
As a precaution, sterile surgical marking pens should be discarded after use on the skin surface and not placed on the sterile field.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Signaling
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail...

