You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
Published on: August 8, 2022
Haowen Liang1,2, Yue Wang1,3, Shangsi Chen3
1Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Additive Manufacturing of High-performance Materials, Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
This study compared three types of 3D-printed bone scaffolds with similar porosity but different structures. The researchers used digital light processing to create scaffolds with cubic pore shapes, body-centered cubic, and triply periodic minimal surface structures. They tested mechanical strength and cell behavior. The cubic pore-shaped scaffolds had the highest strength and supported the most active cell growth. The findings suggest that scaffold design significantly affects performance and could guide future tissue engineering strategies.
Area of Science:
Background:
Porous bone scaffolds are essential for tissue regeneration, yet their effectiveness depends on structural design. Prior research has shown that scaffold morphology influences mechanical strength and cell behavior. However, the impact of specific pore geometries remains unclear. No prior work had resolved how different architectures affect compressive properties and cell activity. This gap motivated a systematic comparison of scaffold types. DLP 3D printing allows precise control over scaffold architecture. Yet, the optimal pore design for bone scaffolds is still debated. Researchers have proposed that pore size and curvature may influence cell metabolism. This study addresses these uncertainties by comparing three scaffold structures.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of scaffold architecture on mechanical and biological performance. The specific problem is the lack of guidance on selecting optimal pore structures for bone scaffolds. The motivation comes from the need to improve scaffold design for clinical use. DLP 3D printing enables fabrication of complex geometries. The goal was to compare three scaffold types: CPS, BCC, and P. The researchers proposed that pore shape and curvature influence compressive strength and cell behavior. The study sought to identify which structure offers the best mechanical and biological outcomes. This could inform future scaffold fabrication strategies.
Main Methods:
The researchers fabricated three scaffold types using DLP 3D printing. The structures included CPS, BCC, and P with ~70% porosity. Scaffold morphologies were analyzed using imaging techniques. Compressive strength and modulus were measured using mechanical testing. Cell proliferation and attachment were assessed in vitro. The study compared the three structures systematically. No prior work had used this combination of structures and methods. The researchers used standard protocols for mechanical and biological evaluations. The approach allowed direct comparison of scaffold performance.
Main Results:
The CPS scaffolds showed the highest compressive strength at ~22.5 MPa. Their modulus was ~400 MPa, significantly higher than other structures. Cell metabolism was most active in CPS scaffolds. This may be due to larger pore size and smaller curvature. CPS structures supported better cell proliferation. BCC and P scaffolds had lower mechanical performance. Cell attachment morphology varied across scaffold types. The results suggest that CPS is optimal for bone scaffolding.
Conclusions:
The authors proposed that CPS scaffolds offer superior mechanical and biological performance. They suggested that pore size and curvature influence scaffold effectiveness. The study supports using CPS structures for bone scaffolding. The findings may guide future scaffold design and fabrication. No prior work had shown such a clear link between structure and performance. The authors emphasized the importance of scaffold architecture. They proposed that DLP 3D printing allows precise control over scaffold design. This could improve outcomes in tissue engineering applications.
The study found that cubic pore-shaped scaffolds had the highest compressive strength (~22.5 MPa) and modulus (~400 MPa), along with the most active cell metabolism.
Digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing was used to fabricate the scaffolds with ~70% porosity.
The researchers propose that larger pore size and smaller curvature in cubic pore-shaped scaffolds may enhance cell metabolism.
The study evaluated cell proliferation and attachment morphology using in vitro cell culture methods.
All scaffolds had ~70% porosity, allowing the researchers to compare structural effects on mechanical and biological performance.
The authors propose that cubic pore-shaped scaffolds processed by DLP 3D printing may be optimal for bone tissue engineering applications.