Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

163
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
163
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

1.3K
Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
1.3K
Toxic Reactions: Overview01:26

Toxic Reactions: Overview

1.2K
When toxic substances penetrate the human body, they disseminate to various tissues, undergoing metabolic changes. This process yields reactive metabolites that may covalently bind with specific target molecules, resulting in toxicity.
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

QSAR Modeling to Predict Aquatic Toxicity Across Multiple Species.

Toxics·2026
Same author

<i>Antennaria dioica</i> (L.) Gaertn. (Asteraceae): From Metabolite Profiling to Comprehensive Evaluation of In Vitro and In Silico Enzyme Inhibitory Activity.

Food science & nutrition·2026
Same author

Molecular dynamics simulations to investigate Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA-gyrase-fluoroquinolone complexes.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2026
Same author

New dimension of ciprofloxacin hybrids: Synthesis, characterization and anticancer evaluation of newly C3-modified ciprofloxacin derivatives.

Bioorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Pairwise Performance Comparison of Docking Scoring Functions: Computational Approach Using InterCriteria Analysis.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Potential systemic availability classification of chemicals for safety assessment.

Environment international·2025
Same journal

Tracking Synthetic Adhesins on Bacterial Surfaces with Immunofluorescence Microscopy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Post-Selection Methods for Analyzing mRNA Display Selections and Optimization of Hits.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

High-Performance Computing in Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Peptide Identification.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Engineering and Adapting Disulfide-Containing Proteins to Enable Intracellular Functionality.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

AI-Driven Protein Research: From Prediction to Design.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Methods for the In Vitro Selection of Protein and Peptide Libraries Using mRNA Display.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.1K

In Silico Models for Predicting Acute Systemic Toxicity.

Ivanka Tsakovska1, Antonia Diukendjieva2, Andrew P Worth3

  • 1Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria. itsakovska@biomed.bas.bg.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|February 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This chapter reviews regulatory needs for acute systemic toxicity data in the EU. It highlights structure-based computational models, particularly quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, for toxicity assessment.

Keywords:
Acute systemic toxicityDatabasesIn silico modelsLD50Organ-specific toxicityQSARRegulatory context

More Related Videos

Human Liver Microphysiological System for Assessing Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity In Vitro
11:06

Human Liver Microphysiological System for Assessing Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity In Vitro

Published on: January 31, 2022

4.8K
Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.1K
Human Liver Microphysiological System for Assessing Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity In Vitro
11:06

Human Liver Microphysiological System for Assessing Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity In Vitro

Published on: January 31, 2022

4.8K
Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • The European Union mandates specific regulatory requirements for assessing acute systemic toxicity.
  • Computational models offer a promising avenue for predicting and evaluating chemical toxicity.
  • Structure-based approaches are increasingly important in toxicological assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of EU regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity data.
  • To review available structure-based computational models for acute systemic toxicity assessment.
  • To discuss recent literature models and future perspectives in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of regulatory guidelines for chemical safety in the European Union.
  • Survey and analysis of existing structure-based computational models, including quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
  • Literature search for recently published models and research in acute systemic toxicity prediction.

Main Results:

  • Identification of key regulatory data requirements for acute systemic toxicity in the EU.
  • Evaluation of the utility and applicability of various structure-based computational models.
  • Summary of the most current quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting acute systemic toxicity.

Conclusions:

  • Structure-based computational models, especially QSAR, are valuable tools for meeting EU regulatory demands for acute systemic toxicity data.
  • Continued development and validation of these models are crucial for advancing toxicological risk assessment.
  • Future research should focus on refining existing models and exploring novel computational approaches.