Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

08:49
Cultivating a Three-dimensional Reconstructed Human Epidermis at a Large Scale
Published on: May 28, 2021
11.6K
In Silico Models for Skin Sensitization and Irritation
Gianluca Selvestrel1, Federica Robino2, Matteo Zanotti Russo2
1Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Environmental Health Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy. gianluca.selvestrel@marionegri.it.
Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|February 21, 2022
Summary
In silico tools offer rapid, cost-effective alternatives for assessing skin irritation and sensitization, crucial for cosmetic safety evaluations. These computational methods align with regulations banning animal testing, promoting innovation in risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology and Computational Science
- Cosmetic Science and Regulatory Affairs
Background:
- Skin irritation and sensitization assessments are evolving, driven by innovation and regulatory changes.
- The European Regulation 1223/2009 mandates a shift away from animal testing for cosmetic safety.
- In silico methods provide a high-speed, low-cost alternative for evaluating topical product safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing in silico models for assessing skin irritation and sensitization.
- To highlight the importance of computational methods in cosmetic safety evaluation.
- To introduce New Approach Methodologies (NAM) and Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for improved risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- Overview of established in silico tools and platforms for chemical evaluation.
- Discussion of computational approaches for predicting skin sensitization and irritation.
- Exploration of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and New Approach Methodologies (NAM).
Main Results:
- Development of public and commercial in silico tools simplifies the evaluation of topical products.
- Computational methods represent a new standard in risk assessment, aligning with regulatory demands.
- These methods are essential for developing sustainable alternatives to animal testing.
Conclusions:
- In silico methods are pivotal for advancing cosmetic safety assessment in the absence of animal testing.
- Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and New Approach Methodologies (NAM) offer future directions for robust risk evaluation.
- The reviewed tools and platforms facilitate the assessment of chemicals for skin irritation and sensitization.

