Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
Comparison between Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and self-reported measures for diagnosing pain in conscious
Daniela Abrão Baroni1, Lucas Guimarães Abreu2, Saul Martins Paiva2
1Dentistry Graduate Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Abstract:
The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), an objective measure of pain based on heart rate variability (HRV), has its usefulness in awake patients still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess ANI's accuracy compared to self-reported pain measures in conscious individuals undergoing medical procedures or painful stimuli. PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and grey literature were searched until March 2021. Of the 832 identified citations, 16 studies complied with the eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis including nine studies demonstrated a weak negative correlation between ANI and NRS for pain assessment in individuals in the post-anesthetic recovery room (r = - 0.0984, 95% CI = - 0.397 to 0.220, I2 = 95.82%), or in those submitted to electrical stimulus (r = - 0.089; 95% CI = - 0.390 to 0.228, I2 = 0%). The evidence to use ANI in conscious individuals is weak compared to self-report measures of pain, yet ANI explains a part of self-report. Therefore, some individuals may be benefited from the use of ANI during procedures or in the immediate postoperative period.
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Nociception

