Related Experiment Video For Computed tomography
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors
Published on: March 29, 2019
Diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability to differentiate between T1- and T2-stage gallbladder cancers
Yong Jae Kwon1, Kyoung Doo Song2, Seong Eun Ko1
1Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Purpose:
To evaluate the diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of differentiating T1 and T2 gallbladder (GB) cancers using multi-detector row CT (MDCT).
Methods:
This retrospective study included 151 patients with surgically confirmed T1 (n = 49)- or T2 (n = 102)-stage GB cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT from 2016 to 2020. Five radiologists (two experienced and three less experienced) evaluated the T-stage with a confidence level calculated using a six-point scale. GB cancers were morphologically classified into three types: polypoid, polypoid with wall thickening, and wall thickening. The diagnostic performance of T-staging was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated based on a binary scale (T1 = positive). Inter-observer agreement was assessed using Fleiss κ statistics.
Results:
The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of each reviewer for T-staging ranged from 0.69 to 0.80 (median 0.77). The overall accuracy of the five radiologists was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84%). Sensitivity was higher and specificity was lower in experienced radiologists than in less experienced radiologists (P < 0.001). The overall inter-observer agreement was fair (κ = 0.36; 95% CI 0.31, 0.41). The overall accuracy for T-stage was 63% (95% CI 48-76), 78% (95% CI 63-88), and 87% (95% CI 77-93) for polypoid, polypoid with wall thickening, and wall thickening type, respectively.
Conclusion:
The accuracy of MDCT for differentiating T1 and T2 GB cancer is limited, and there is considerable inter-observer variability.
More Related Videos
09:49Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
Published on: December 2, 2013
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...