Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of the newly introduced Deauville Score 5a in patients treated for advanced-stage classic Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Hodgkin lymphoma: EHA Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

HemaSphere·2026
Same author

Multimodal Deep Learning for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing <sup>177</sup>Lu-Based Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Automatic Delineation of Tumor Spheroids in Microscopic Images Using Deep-Learning.

ACS measurement science au·2026
Same author

Gonadal function and fertility after Hodgkin lymphoma treatment with nivolumab-AVD in the phase 2 GHSG NIVAHL trial.

Blood·2026
Same author

CT Radiomics Models Did Not Outperform Experts in Predicting [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET Positivity in Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Staging.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same journal

Correction: Luca et al. Global and Regional Diagnostic Results of Progress Toward Cervical Cancer Elimination, According to the WHO Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review with Narrative Synthesis. <i>Diagnostics</i> 2026, <i>16</i>, 1224.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Association Between Systemic Inflammatory Response Biomarkers and Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Vertebrogenic Low Back Pain and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation: A Review of Mechanisms, Imaging-Driven Selection, and Clinical Outcomes.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Multivalvular Carcinoid Heart Disease: The Role of Echocardiography in Diagnosis and Selection for Heterotopic Bicaval Valve Implantation.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Data-Efficient and Explainable Multimodal Survival Prediction in NSCLC Using Deep Image Embeddings, Clinical Variables, and Gradient-Boosted Trees.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Anomalous Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery: Cinematic Volume Rendering Technique for Enhanced Anatomic Visualization.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
06:31

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.4K

Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.

Julian M M Rogasch1,2, Frank Hofheinz3, Lutz van Heek4

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New positron emission tomography (PET) technologies coexist with older ones, impacting image accuracy and interpretation. This review examines factors affecting PET quantification and interpretation in clinical practice.

Keywords:
contrast recoveryimage interpretationimage qualitypositron emission tomographyquantitative accuracysignal-to-noise ratio

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
08:02

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals

Published on: November 15, 2024

747
Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses
07:59

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Published on: September 19, 2011

12.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
06:31

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.4K
Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
08:02

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals

Published on: November 15, 2024

747
Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses
07:59

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Published on: September 19, 2011

12.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Positron emission tomography (PET) is crucial for clinical diagnosis and monitoring.
  • Quantitative accuracy and image interpretation are vital for effective PET utilization.
  • Technological advancements in PET hardware and software are rapidly evolving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review factors influencing quantitative accuracy in PET imaging.
  • To summarize recent developments in PET technology affecting image interpretation.
  • To reevaluate the clinical value of PET in light of technological transitions.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review focusing on PET quantification and interpretation.
  • Analysis of factors impacting quantitative accuracy.
  • Examination of recent technological advancements in PET hardware and software.

Main Results:

  • Identified key factors influencing quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in PET.
  • Highlighted the coexistence of traditional and new PET technologies in clinical settings.
  • Discussed the impact of these factors on the clinical value of PET imaging.

Conclusions:

  • Careful reevaluation of PET imaging's clinical value is necessary due to technological changes.
  • Understanding the interplay between quantitative accuracy and subjective interpretation is crucial.
  • The review provides a foundation for optimizing PET utilization in routine clinical practice.