Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
The Modified Alberta Reconstructive Technique: A prospective cohort study
Justin M Pyne1, Brendan C Kelly1, Heather Logan2
1University of Alberta - Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada.
Introduction:
Jaw defect reconstructions have been transformed by the development of free tissue transfer using vascularized bone incorporating osseointegrated dental implants. We recently developed a modification our method this procedure and termed it the Modified Alberta Reconstruction Technique (MART). The objective of this study aimed to assess the soft tissue component and outcomes of the MART as compared to the Alberta Reconstructive Technique (ART) or conventional (BDD) reconstructions.
Patients And Methods:
This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent jaw reconstruction with dental implant rehabilitation between 2000 and 2019 in Edmonton, Alberta. Patients were aged-matched and placed into a cohort based on the type of reconstruction they received. Outcomes were compared between the groups. Expert and aesthetic analyses were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine significance.
Results:
A total of 46 patients (15 BDD, 15 ART and 16 MART) were included. Demographics were similar between groups. There was no difference in complications. The soft tissue component of the MART cohort was more favourable to work with as judged by the occlusal reconstructive experts. The MART was rated as more aesthetically appealing in comparison to the BDD and ART (p = 0.049).
Conclusions:
The MART is a safe, effective, and aesthetically appealing procedure. It yields a good functional result and a clinically better soft tissue component for occlusal reconstructions. For a select group of patients requiring jaw reconstruction, the MART is an ideal reconstructive option as the modification provides good control of the soft tissue around the implants.
More Related Videos
06:03Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022